stability in the "UART" communication over BLE.

RE: stability in the "UART" communication over BLE.

Carles — Tue, 26 Jan 2016 16:14:32 GMT

ok, happy to help

RE: stability in the "UART" communication over BLE.

JudePinto — Tue, 26 Jan 2016 00:12:24 GMT

Hi Carles, thank you for the comment about BLE_EVT_TX_COMPLETE. I am getting the 0x3004 error and I believe this is what I needed to know.

RE: stability in the "UART" communication over BLE.

Carles — Wed, 25 Mar 2015 14:14:23 GMT

Hi there,

If you're getting 0x3004 as an error code, then the actual error you're getting is:

#define BLE_ERROR_NO_TX_BUFFERS          (NRF_ERROR_STK_BASE_NUM+0x004) /**< Buffer capacity exceeded. */

That error happens when you try to queue more data for transmission than the stack can buffer. You will need to wait for an BLE_EVT_TX_COMPLETE event before you transmit more if you want to avoid getting this error.

Carles

RE: stability in the "UART" communication over BLE.

bka — Wed, 25 Mar 2015 13:47:32 GMT

Hi I checked in my code for sd enabled as: err_code = sd_softdevice_is_enabled(&chk); if(chk == 1){ err_code = ble_nus_send_string(&m_nus, &bleBuffer[0], 20); else{ "kick sd on again" - How is that done? } I observe, that chk = 1 (SD enabled), but err_code = 0x3004 - indicating that SD is disabled?????

best regards Benni

RE: stability in the "UART" communication over BLE.

Susheel Nuguru — Wed, 25 Mar 2015 12:40:07 GMT

Hi,

Can you check using a breakpoint at this error and see that the softdevice is still enabled. This error is very straight forward and is checked just before the entry into the softdevice.