<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>NRF24L01+ multiceiver mode</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/6341/nrf24l01-multiceiver-mode</link><description>Hello, 
 I&amp;#39;m working on a project with a &amp;quot;master&amp;quot; NRF24L01+ with a unique address and around 10 &amp;quot;slave&amp;quot; and all have a unique address, a broadcast address and some sub broadcast address (broadcast addresses don&amp;#39;t have any auto ack). 
 It&amp;#39;s working perfectly</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2015 06:12:19 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/6341/nrf24l01-multiceiver-mode" /><item><title>RE: NRF24L01+ multiceiver mode</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/22111?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2015 06:12:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:c211882c-5242-4828-89b5-3fd70264d476</guid><dc:creator>julien</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks for your help.
I have found my mistake...
For pipe 1, LSB and MSB were inverted.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: NRF24L01+ multiceiver mode</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/22110?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2015 06:03:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:39d6de0b-911e-45f9-9b9d-0c54fb6e1f71</guid><dc:creator>Asbj&amp;#248;rn</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;What is the purpose of the different RX_ADDR_P0 on the slaves? Are they the unique addresses? Are you using them when it fails? From the description you say that only two slaves work and that is usually caused my address configurations on the receiving pipes. The 5 bytes for pipe0 needs to be unique compared to pipe1-5. So for pipe0 you can use for example 0xC4 0xC4 0xC4 0xC4 0xC4, but for pipe1 you have to avoid 0xC4. So if you for example give pipe1 0xD5 0xD5 0xD50xD5 0xD5 you would be fine and the the last byte of pipe 2-5 would have to be unique as the first 4 bytes are shared with pipe1.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So try changing the  &amp;#39;V&amp;#39;,&amp;#39;o&amp;#39;,&amp;#39;l&amp;#39;,0x00,0x02 addresses used on the slaves and ensure that the bytes used in pipe0 are unique compared to pipe1-5 on the same slave.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>