<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>what is the reason that certain addresses have less receiving sensitivity than others using nRF mode? Can you confirm these addresses are &amp;quot;address prefix field&amp;quot; talked in infocenter?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/63497/what-is-the-reason-that-certain-addresses-have-less-receiving-sensitivity-than-others-using-nrf-mode-can-you-confirm-these-addresses-are-address-prefix-field-talked-in-infocenter</link><description>Hi Devzone: 
 I am researching how to maximize radio performance and stumbled on a statement on page 356 in the spec: 
 
 &amp;quot;Typical sensitivity applies when ADDR0 is used for receiver address correlation. When ADDR[1..7] are used for receiver address correlation</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2020 10:18:15 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/63497/what-is-the-reason-that-certain-addresses-have-less-receiving-sensitivity-than-others-using-nrf-mode-can-you-confirm-these-addresses-are-address-prefix-field-talked-in-infocenter" /><item><title>RE: what is the reason that certain addresses have less receiving sensitivity than others using nRF mode? Can you confirm these addresses are "address prefix field" talked in infocenter?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/258967?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2020 10:18:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:c5e3448f-3b94-4f6d-8183-fc2ea18564b0</guid><dc:creator>Kenneth</dc:creator><description>[quote user=""]is ADDR0&amp;nbsp;essentially&amp;nbsp;PREFIX0.AP0?[/quote]
&lt;p&gt;Yes, ADDR0 is BASE0 + PREFIX.AP0.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
[quote user=""]In the ESB instruction it talks about pipes 0~7, are these &lt;strong&gt;&amp;quot;pipes&amp;quot;&lt;/strong&gt; refering to these&lt;strong&gt; address prefix field&lt;/strong&gt; mentioned above?[/quote]
&lt;p&gt;Yes pipe0 is same as ADDR0.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>