<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>ANTWAREII searches much faster than my nRF51422</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/6469/antwareii-searches-much-faster-than-my-nrf51422</link><description>In my test, with the same configuration, ANTWARE II always searches much faster than nRF51422 software. 
 For example. I have Master channel and Slave channel set up at 4Hz.
Use one of my nRF51422 board as the master channel.
Use ANTWARE II as the</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2015 14:09:35 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/6469/antwareii-searches-much-faster-than-my-nrf51422" /><item><title>RE: ANTWAREII searches much faster than my nRF51422</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/22567?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2015 14:09:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:9b19d248-14d9-4c07-a2bb-afa1503a092a</guid><dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;P.S. I think ANT II is using 97 too.
Be aware. any number other than 316 or 97 may not work because the searching algorithm Dynastream is using.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: ANTWAREII searches much faster than my nRF51422</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/22566?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2015 14:08:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:45ec4e49-0cb3-4721-818e-59c0e55fa674</guid><dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Petter.
I am working on this right now :-)
sd_ant_search_waveform_set() did the trick. default is 316, I set it to 97 as ANT datasheet suggested.
Now it tracks much faster.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: ANTWAREII searches much faster than my nRF51422</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/22565?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2015 14:05:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:64e9e8c4-02b7-4fa3-9584-305b17beda1a</guid><dc:creator>Petter Myhre</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;1.5 seconds on average and 3 seconds as maximum is expected with the nRF51422 as a slave, with a message period of 4 Hz on the master.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m not sure how ANTWARE II is searching, but it may be using High Duty Search since it is using an USB device. nRF51422 can&amp;#39;t use High Duty Search. For more information, please see Page 58 and Page 80 in the ANT Message Protocol and Usage, Rev 5.1.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You may be able to reduce the search time by changing the search waveform, but I haven&amp;#39;t tested this myself. For more information, please see &lt;code&gt;sd_ant_search_waveform_set()&lt;/code&gt; and Page 70 ANT Message Protocol and Usage, Rev 5.1.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>