<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>NRF52832, which SDK to use for ultra low power GATT application</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/65703/nrf52832-which-sdk-to-use-for-ultra-low-power-gatt-application</link><description>Hi, 
 I&amp;#39;m evaluating the NRF52832 for an ultra low power BLE application where I&amp;#39;m going to use GATT. I&amp;#39;ve built some prototypes with the NRF52832 and right now I have to choose which SDK to use, the &amp;quot;standard/old&amp;quot; or the new &amp;quot;NRF Connect SDK&amp;quot;. 
 In my</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2020 12:24:28 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/65703/nrf52832-which-sdk-to-use-for-ultra-low-power-gatt-application" /><item><title>RE: NRF52832, which SDK to use for ultra low power GATT application</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/268744?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2020 12:24:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:b1255173-f4c6-4611-8420-49e16d7433b4</guid><dc:creator>Augusto</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the quick reply.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I will use the nRF5 SDK.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: NRF52832, which SDK to use for ultra low power GATT application</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/268735?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2020 11:58:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:e6051a27-9203-4e9e-a6bb-95a764c83c2e</guid><dc:creator>Karl Ylvisaker</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello,&lt;/p&gt;
[quote user=""]wait for interrupt, read sensor via spi, do some DSP, update value in GATT.[/quote][quote user=""]What do you recommend? Is there a difference in power consumption between the two SDKs?&amp;nbsp;[/quote]
&lt;p&gt;You will not go wrong with the nRF5 SDK - it is a very mature SDK that has been production-ready for a long time already, and that is closer to &amp;quot;traditional&amp;quot; micro-controller programming.&lt;br /&gt;In regards to power consumption both options are good, but nothing beats bare-metal when it comes to cutting down on CPU instructions.&lt;/p&gt;
[quote user=""]I&amp;#39;m leaning more toward the &amp;quot;old SDK&amp;quot; as it seems less complicated to get going but maybe I&amp;#39;m mistaken.[/quote]
&lt;p&gt;This depends, but from your ticket it sounds to me like you already are somewhat familiar with the nRF5 SDK which then definitely is easier to get going with.&lt;br /&gt;For the time being there are also more examples provided with the nRF5 SDK, which is very useful to have a look at when you begin your own development.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Best regards,&lt;br /&gt;Karl&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>