<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>S310 v2 Example Code does not follow Migration Guide advice</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/6572/s310-v2-example-code-does-not-follow-migration-guide-advice</link><description>The s310_nrf51422 migration document states: 
 Due to an issue present in this release, the application is required to set the device address to the factory default right
after calling sd_ble_enable(), this can be achieved with the following lines:</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2015 13:27:43 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/6572/s310-v2-example-code-does-not-follow-migration-guide-advice" /><item><title>RE: S310 v2 Example Code does not follow Migration Guide advice</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/22951?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2015 13:27:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:b6cd611b-1200-4d43-b444-6eee94ef5129</guid><dc:creator>awneil</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;OK - thanks.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It would have been more helpful if the Migration Document had given that reference (DRGN-4521) - instead of just saying, &amp;quot;an issue present in this release&amp;quot;.
That way, we would have been able to see that the issue was fixed - otherwise, we can&amp;#39;t be sure which &amp;quot;issue&amp;quot; the Document is talking about!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: S310 v2 Example Code does not follow Migration Guide advice</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/22950?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2015 13:26:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:4eb0bba9-6a45-4bf2-9ee8-d73f1d436cc2</guid><dc:creator>Hung Bui</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;@Awneil: Seems that it&amp;#39;s a bug with our migration document. The issue with the address when pairing was fixed on S310 v2.0 so the workaround is not needed anymore.
You can find this information in the S310 v2.0 release note at bugfixes section, DRGN-4521 was fixed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I will report this internally for a fix.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: S310 v2 Example Code does not follow Migration Guide advice</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/22949?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2015 21:33:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:bd2737ca-1e14-4ce7-b4cc-81130925d983</guid><dc:creator>awneil</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;A similar question about S110: &lt;a href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/question/14627/do-we-need-sd_ble_gap_enable-in-current-s110-v7-code/"&gt;devzone.nordicsemi.com/.../&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The answer says that the migration document in that case is correct, but does not explain why the examples do not follow the guidance!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>