<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>SES Version Compatibility</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/66728/ses-version-compatibility</link><description>Does Nordic recommend a specific version of SES? Should I just download the latest version direct from Segger or do I need a special version of SES to have full compatibility with nRF52 devices? 
 After browsing the Nordic website and DevZone it&amp;#39;s not</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2020 15:32:21 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/66728/ses-version-compatibility" /><item><title>RE: SES Version Compatibility</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/273299?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2020 15:32:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:11c6a5b9-81ca-4e81-aeba-86919ae467a1</guid><dc:creator>CheMax</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;It&amp;#39;s my pleasure. I actually spent a few days dealing with project compatibility issues after the upgrade.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Look, the main difference between 4 and 5 studio versions is only in the size of the generated firmware hex file. And only when using the proprietary &lt;strong&gt;linker&lt;/strong&gt; and &lt;strong&gt;compiler&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;strong&gt;from Segger&lt;/strong&gt;. Otherwise, the list of changes is not significant.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: SES Version Compatibility</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/273289?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2020 14:44:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:bf6bae40-b7cf-49a7-9d1a-33f339182c9b</guid><dc:creator>mchartier</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for posting, you probably saved me many hours of frustration. I was going to try the latest SES v5.10 but now I will definitely stick to a version referenced in the nRF SDK release notes. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: SES Version Compatibility</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/273097?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2020 07:45:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:175a2f91-91ff-47c2-aeb9-e0a7d5690587</guid><dc:creator>CheMax</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Not certainly in that way. sometimes upgrading to a new version leads to interesting bugs. For example,&lt;a href="https://forum.segger.com/index.php/Thread/7473-SOLVED-Problem-with-new-projects-Relocation-R-ARM-THM-CALL/"&gt;problem with new projects for nrf52&lt;/a&gt; ,my discussion of the problem on the Segger forum.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By the way, it also states that Nordic must provide an updated package (Nordic Semiconductor nRF CPU Support Package).&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: SES Version Compatibility</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/273084?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2020 07:07:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:dadf5897-1ef6-4e2a-bff9-3b9533a21b71</guid><dc:creator>Einar Thorsrud</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;The Nordic SES variant has support for configuring and building nRF Connect SDK projects, using Cmake and Kconfig etc. Other then that it is equivalent to the &amp;quot;normal&amp;quot; SES edition. The free SES license for Nordic targets applies to both SES variants.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: SES Version Compatibility</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/273062?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2020 20:50:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:f20bb0b8-bda0-4173-bd1d-4c2987946752</guid><dc:creator>mchartier</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks, that does make sense. Do you know what is the difference between the standard Segger release of SES and the Nordic variant? I read the Nordic version has an extra menu option&amp;nbsp;&lt;span&gt;&amp;quot;Open nRF Connect SDK Project&amp;quot; which could be a nice benefit. Any others? Will the Segger&amp;nbsp;licensing work the same with either version?&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: SES Version Compatibility</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/273055?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2020 19:32:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:ca1c3ecb-b5e6-45ea-a37e-dc5a41f93184</guid><dc:creator>Einar Thorsrud</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The release notes of every nRF5 SDK version specifies which version of SES (and other toolchains) has been used for release testing, and it could make sense to pick the same version. For instance you can see &lt;a href="https://infocenter.nordicsemi.com/topic/sdk_nrf5_v17.0.2/index.html"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;that SDK 17.0.2 was release tested using SES 4.50. In most cases using a newer version should not cause any problems, though.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>