<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>CPU not seen with nRF51 DK</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/6685/cpu-not-seen-with-nrf51-dk</link><description>I haven&amp;#39;t seen any posts about this, so I thought I&amp;#39;d post what I observed and how I fixed it in the hope this helps someone else. 
 My nRF51 DK (PCA10028 v1.1.0) out of the blue stopped accepting new programming. That is, I could see the JLink target</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2015 22:46:56 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/6685/cpu-not-seen-with-nrf51-dk" /><item><title>RE: CPU not seen with nRF51 DK</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/23447?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2015 22:46:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:7085ede5-9978-45ce-8260-3d88fc37d55e</guid><dc:creator>Nick Pelis</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Like they always tell you in tech support, if all else fails, reset!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: CPU not seen with nRF51 DK</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/23446?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2015 18:28:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:87030c78-1853-4fd2-a161-9e20bce8b2e2</guid><dc:creator>Susheel Nuguru</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I guess your chip was in &amp;quot;Nirvana&amp;quot; state and you managed to wake it up with your charm. Smart thinking and I will remember this for the future and thanks a lot for taking your time to let others know of this solution. We really appreciate that. +1 point to your from me.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>