<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>nRF52832 Timer power consumption</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/67457/nrf52832-timer-power-consumption</link><description>Hi 
 I&amp;#39;m using nRF52832, SDK 16. 
 When I enabling timer application the power consumption is increased by ~450uA, far away from the product specification 
 
 
 What may cause to this difference? 
 Thanks</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2020 08:02:41 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/67457/nrf52832-timer-power-consumption" /><item><title>RE: nRF52832 Timer power consumption</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/276788?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2020 08:02:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:d1c4df1c-056d-4259-a42d-f6483c2245c0</guid><dc:creator>Simonr</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The current consumption of the timer example is affected by what frequency you have set your timer to use. The datasheet only looks at the current consumption of the peripheral itself. When the 16MHz clock is enabled, there are a few other parts of the digital domain that also consume more power. This is unfortunately not documented that well.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Simon&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: nRF52832 Timer power consumption</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/276380?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2020 08:50:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:f9f854e2-e034-4dca-b578-a6530a7879f9</guid><dc:creator>shai.c</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;My mistake with the link, the correct one is:&amp;nbsp;\examples\peripheral\timer&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://infocenter.nordicsemi.com/index.jsp?topic=%2Fsdk_nrf5_v17.0.2%2Fnrf_dev_timer_example.html&amp;amp;cp=7_1_4_6_46"&gt;Time Example&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;&lt;span&gt;Please make sure that the HF clock is not initialized and started somewhere in your application&amp;quot; - In this example, there is no use of HF Clock.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: nRF52832 Timer power consumption</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/276215?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2020 13:17:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:4dc30821-706e-487a-bd40-d09c447317f4</guid><dc:creator>Simonr</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;This is a link to the RTC example. Yes, this is using the LF clock, but I assume you&amp;#39;re pointing to some other example? If it&amp;#39;s the &lt;span&gt;\&lt;a href="https://infocenter.nordicsemi.com/topic/sdk_nrf5_v17.0.2/nrf_dev_timer_example.html"&gt;examples\peripheral\timer&lt;/a&gt; you&amp;#39;re referring to, this is by no means optimized for low current consumption. Please make sure that the HF clock is not initialized and started somewhere in your application.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Simon&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: nRF52832 Timer power consumption</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/276145?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2020 10:24:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:7dd9697a-905a-45b0-a3e1-91a8e399a268</guid><dc:creator>shai.c</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Simon,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Which clock is using in&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://infocenter.nordicsemi.com/index.jsp?topic=%2Fsdk_nrf5_v17.0.2%2Frtc_example.html"&gt;Timer Example&lt;/a&gt;? isn&amp;#39;t it &lt;span&gt;LF clock&lt;/span&gt;?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: nRF52832 Timer power consumption</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/276132?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2020 09:36:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:e5f4e874-bb7b-4b14-8573-3dd11eecdabd</guid><dc:creator>Simonr</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A current draw of ~450 µA pints to the HFCLK being kept running, which seems to be the case here. To minimize current consumption I would suggest looking at I.E. the &lt;a href="https://infocenter.nordicsemi.com/topic/sdk_nrf5_v17.0.2/rtc_example.html"&gt;RTC example project&lt;/a&gt; which uses the LF clock to keep track of time and will draw way less power than if the HF clock is being kept running.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Simon&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>