<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Erratum [220] in SoftDevice S132 V7.2.0</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/68178/erratum-220-in-softdevice-s132-v7-2-0</link><description>Hi all, 
 
 In the nRF52832 erratasheet, for erratum [220] it states: 
 &amp;quot;SoftDevice v7.0.1 includes an alternative workaround which does not support FPU being enabled.&amp;quot; 
 
 Am I correct in assuming, that this alternative workaround is not included in</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2020 11:15:28 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/68178/erratum-220-in-softdevice-s132-v7-2-0" /><item><title>RE: Erratum [220] in SoftDevice S132 V7.2.0</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/279203?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2020 11:15:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:c06d6625-8a94-4037-a6f4-da19ee1d556b</guid><dc:creator>Pascal K&amp;#252;nzi</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Einar,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That&amp;#39;s good to know.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks a lot for the quick response and clarifying this for me.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Erratum [220] in SoftDevice S132 V7.2.0</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/279185?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2020 10:35:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:f026f06f-5d3d-48cd-a412-27894155df39</guid><dc:creator>Einar Thorsrud</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Pascal,&lt;/p&gt;
[quote user=""]Am I correct in assuming, that this alternative workaround is not included in V7.2.0?[/quote]
&lt;p&gt;No. SoftDevices version 7.2.0 use the same workaround for &lt;a href="https://infocenter.nordicsemi.com/topic/errata_nRF52832_Rev2/ERR/nRF52832/Rev2/latest/anomaly_832_220.html"&gt;erratum 220&lt;/a&gt; as version 7.0.1.&lt;/p&gt;
[quote user=""]Thus, I have to implement the workaround as shown in the erratasheet when using the SoftDevice V7.2.0?[/quote]
&lt;p&gt;No. And you would not have to implement it if using SoftDevice version 8 either, as that has the other workaround implemented.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This may not be relevant for you, but if you need to use the FPU and a SoftDevice version 7.0.1 or 7.2.0,&amp;nbsp;then that is possible to disabling stacking of FPU registers.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>