Softdevice Not Disabled

RE: Softdevice Not Disabled

Surya — Thu, 07 Jan 2021 10:53:51 GMT

No, but I changed my code so that disabling SD is not required. I think this ticket should be closed but how?

RE: Softdevice Not Disabled

Vidar Berg — Thu, 07 Jan 2021 09:20:37 GMT

Have you had any progress on this? The state flag is cleared right after sd_softdevice_disable() so there must be something preventing the programming from reaching this line. I suggest placing breakpoints on the return statements above sd_softdevice_disable() in nrf_sdh_disable_request() to see if there are any unexpected returns.

RE: Softdevice Not Disabled

Surya — Tue, 05 Jan 2021 07:41:37 GMT

yes,

nrf_sdh_disable_request() return NRF_SUCCESS even when the Softdevice did not get disabled.

RE: Softdevice Not Disabled

Vidar Berg — Mon, 04 Jan 2021 09:46:31 GMT

No, only state observers should be able to reject the SD disable requests. Does nrf_sdh_disable_request() return NRF_SUCCESS even when the Softdevice did not get disabled?

RE: Softdevice Not Disabled

Surya — Wed, 30 Dec 2020 07:24:46 GMT

hi,

I am using NRF_SDH_BLE_OBSERVER in my application. can this also deny NRF_SDH_EVT_DISABLE_REQUEST??

RE: Softdevice Not Disabled

Vidar Berg — Tue, 29 Dec 2020 07:57:59 GMT

Hi,

Please check if you have any SoftDevice state observers that might potentially deny the NRF_SDH_EVT_DISABLE_REQUEST.