Difference between DFU and Segger Studio Build and Run/Debug

RE: Difference between DFU and Segger Studio Build and Run/Debug

PauDC — Thu, 07 Jan 2021 16:03:50 GMT

Thanks Awneil and Edvin.

While debugging I saw an error in my code that somehow it only triggered when using method b.

Nevertheless I'm going to keep testing what both of you said, just to understand everything.

Thank you.

RE: Difference between DFU and Segger Studio Build and Run/Debug

awneil — Thu, 07 Jan 2021 15:36:40 GMT

[quote userid="89030" url="~/f/nordic-q-a/70217/difference-between-dfu-and-segger-studio-build-and-run-debug/287999#287999"]What do you mean by cold start[/quote]

Starting immediately after a power-up or System Reset - when all the chips systems, registers, and peripherals will be in the defined initial states.

With a bootloader, it's that bootloader that runs immediately after a reset or power-up; not your code - your code doesn't get to start until after the bootloader has run.

Therefore the bootloader may have changed some stuff from its reset defaults. If your code is relying upon the reset defaults, it won't behave as expected...

RE: Difference between DFU and Segger Studio Build and Run/Debug

Edvin — Thu, 07 Jan 2021 15:27:43 GMT

Hello,

I agree with Awneil. You should try to debug your B version. Your application samples some data and sends it over BLE, I assume. Based on your figures, it looks like B has less samples than A (Less frequently sampled). So you need to debug to check whether:

1: B doesn't sample as often as A.

2: B samples as often as A, but is not able to send all the data through BLE. Hint: Check the return value of the function that is sending data, probably sd_ble_gatts_hvx().

To debug in SES while you have the bootloader programmed, make sure that B is flashed either by performing the DFU, or by flashing directly in addition to generating and flashing bootloader settings (using nrfutil). Then press "Target" -> "Attach Debugger".

If you hit build and run, then Segger will flash the application, and the bootloader will reject the application, because no bootloader settings are matching the application.

Best regards,

Edvin

RE: Difference between DFU and Segger Studio Build and Run/Debug

PauDC — Thu, 07 Jan 2021 15:08:12 GMT

Hello Awneil, Thanks for the fast reply.

I'm going to try to print some timestamps when the load cell is reading the data to check if the issue is here.

Now I'm receiving the number of packets I'm expecting, it's just like the data doesn't update as fast as it did before.

I don't understand your last sentence. What do you mean by cold start and the state of the bootloader?

I mean I update the firmware correctly. I can reset the device as many times as I want that the result is always the same.

RE: Difference between DFU and Segger Studio Build and Run/Debug

awneil — Thu, 07 Jan 2021 14:42:44 GMT

So have you tried debugging the B version to see what's going on?

Looks like it might be running at different (slower) speed?

Starting from a bootloader isn't a "cold start" - you have to take account of what state the bootloader has left things in ...