<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Problem with Enhanced Shockburst on NRF52832</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/70646/problem-with-enhanced-shockburst-on-nrf52832</link><description>Good Day, 
 we are currently working on a project for university. For this project, we are using esb to transmit a continuous audio stream (i2s format). We sample our data at 44100 Hz. Before sending we compress the data so that the padding bytes of the</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2021 09:47:17 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/70646/problem-with-enhanced-shockburst-on-nrf52832" /><item><title>RE: Problem with Enhanced Shockburst on NRF52832</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/290963?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2021 09:47:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:b892b19f-8d7c-4a6a-92d6-d60694d93cc7</guid><dc:creator>Kenneth</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;It is very likely some kind of noise, on either supply or digital pins (VDD, GND, SWD, serial interfaces) that affect transmission or reception. Alternatively the antenna is de-tuned due to the way it is located. I recommend to for instance measure on an oscilloscope to see if you can see any noise, you may also try to add some decoupling close to the module. You may need make a new case to let someone with hardware experience review your layout and schematic.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best regards,&lt;br /&gt;Kenneth&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Problem with Enhanced Shockburst on NRF52832</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/290824?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2021 18:22:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:cb8230ef-1d9e-4737-9725-96b66e379202</guid><dc:creator>ZeroSebastian</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I have run a few tests now. One with a timer that triggers (i2s was disabled) in the same interval as if the i2s buffers are filled. The problem remains the same it only works when the modules are very close to each other.&lt;br /&gt;Could the continuous stream and the throughput be the problem? Every ~1020 ms a total of 135 bytes of payload are sent.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So i2s does not seem to affect the transmission. Nevertheless I have outlined the traces below:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/4/i2s_5F00_traces.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks in advance&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sebastian&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Problem with Enhanced Shockburst on NRF52832</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/290312?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2021 14:52:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:24849a97-3230-457a-8f56-835628e23703</guid><dc:creator>Kenneth</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;It&amp;#39;s very likely digital noise from I2S yes, can you for instance try to highlight the traces in your picture the I2S pins? Which pins do you use for I2S?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Kenneth&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Problem with Enhanced Shockburst on NRF52832</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/290184?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2021 10:05:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:439d5f64-ba4f-44e9-9202-03d0a567ccbb</guid><dc:creator>ZeroSebastian</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you for the quick reply!&lt;br /&gt;Yes, I have followed the instructions and added some extra space. It was stated as &amp;quot;acceptable&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;I have disabled i2s now and I am sending a static buffer with the same size and the same interval and indeed the problem seems to appear less frequently. Also, the range has increased.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Is this really caused by the i2s noise?&amp;nbsp;I am calling the esb send function during the i2s callback when a buffer is received. Can this be the issue? I have tried enabling the i2s peripheral and sending the data statically with the same effect as mentioned before.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Problem with Enhanced Shockburst on NRF52832</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/290059?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2021 15:55:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:c9ff7151-e342-4217-9c58-2b4f06788c8b</guid><dc:creator>Kenneth</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Have you followed the module manufacturers guidelines to placement and handling?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Is there any difference in range if you do simple back and forth data using fixed payloads (without I2S)? Just trying to figure out of it may be digital noise from the I2S that affect the range here or not.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best regards,&lt;br /&gt;Kenneth&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>