NRF Toolbox with NRF52 Eval Board

RE: NRF Toolbox with NRF52 Eval Board

saravana0210 — Fri, 26 Feb 2021 07:18:18 GMT

It worked!

Thank you for your help

RE: NRF Toolbox with NRF52 Eval Board

Vidar Berg — Thu, 25 Feb 2021 11:23:47 GMT

No problem, thanks for confirming. There are multiple declarations of the UART IRQ handler because there are 2 driver implementions in your project, one SDK driver, and one custom. PRS is also not needed here (what is PRS?)

Here are the changes I had to make to build your project:

diff --git a/pca10040/s132/config/sdk_config.h b/pca10040/s132/config/sdk_config.h
index 03ec1a5..2534118 100644
--- a/pca10040/s132/config/sdk_config.h
+++ b/pca10040/s132/config/sdk_config.h
@@ -2696,7 +2696,7 @@
 // <e> NRFX_PRS_ENABLED - nrfx_prs - Peripheral Resource Sharing module
 //==========================================================
 #ifndef NRFX_PRS_ENABLED
-#define NRFX_PRS_ENABLED 1
+#define NRFX_PRS_ENABLED 0
 #endif
 // <q> NRFX_PRS_BOX_0_ENABLED  - Enables box 0 in the module.
  
@@ -7605,7 +7605,7 @@
 // <e> NRF_LOG_BACKEND_RTT_ENABLED - nrf_log_backend_rtt - Log RTT backend
 //==========================================================
 #ifndef NRF_LOG_BACKEND_RTT_ENABLED
-#define NRF_LOG_BACKEND_RTT_ENABLED 0
+#define NRF_LOG_BACKEND_RTT_ENABLED 1
 #endif
 // <o> NRF_LOG_BACKEND_RTT_TEMP_BUFFER_SIZE - Size of buffer for partially processed strings. 
 // <i> Size of the buffer is a trade-off between RAM usage and processing.
@@ -7638,7 +7638,7 @@
 // <e> NRF_LOG_BACKEND_UART_ENABLED - nrf_log_backend_uart - Log UART backend
 //==========================================================
 #ifndef NRF_LOG_BACKEND_UART_ENABLED
-#define NRF_LOG_BACKEND_UART_ENABLED 1
+#define NRF_LOG_BACKEND_UART_ENABLED 0
 #endif
 // <o> NRF_LOG_BACKEND_UART_TX_PIN - UART TX pin 
 #ifndef NRF_LOG_BACKEND_UART_TX_PIN
diff --git a/pca10040/s132/ses/ble_app_hts_pca10040_s132.emProject b/pca10040/s132/ses/ble_app_hts_pca10040_s132.emProject
index 3687504..457e017 100644
--- a/pca10040/s132/ses/ble_app_hts_pca10040_s132.emProject
+++ b/pca10040/s132/ses/ble_app_hts_pca10040_s132.emProject
@@ -88,9 +88,6 @@
       <file file_name="../../../../../../modules/nrfx/soc/nrfx_atomic.c" />
       <file file_name="../../../../../../modules/nrfx/drivers/src/nrfx_clock.c" />
       <file file_name="../../../../../../modules/nrfx/drivers/src/nrfx_gpiote.c" />
-      <file file_name="../../../../../../modules/nrfx/drivers/src/prs/nrfx_prs.c" />
-      <file file_name="../../../../../../modules/nrfx/drivers/src/nrfx_uart.c" />
-      <file file_name="../../../../../../modules/nrfx/drivers/src/nrfx_uarte.c" />
     </folder>
     <folder Name="Board Support">
       <file file_name="../../../../../../components/libraries/bsp/bsp.c" />

Notice that logging over UART has to be disabled as well as it depends on the nordic UART driver. You can use RTT instead.

RE: NRF Toolbox with NRF52 Eval Board

saravana0210 — Thu, 25 Feb 2021 09:40:30 GMT

Sorry, it is nRF52832 chip NOT nRF52810

(N52832 OFAAB0 1740JK)

RE: NRF Toolbox with NRF52 Eval Board

Vidar Berg — Thu, 25 Feb 2021 08:18:41 GMT

Hi,

Are you using the nRF52 DK (pca10040)? The project you sent me is configured for the nRF52832 chip, not the nRF58210 as stated initially. You should have started with the "pca10040e" project if you are targetting the nRF52810 (see Developing for nRF52810 for more information)

RE: NRF Toolbox with NRF52 Eval Board

saravana0210 — Thu, 25 Feb 2021 07:20:07 GMT

devzone.nordicsemi.com/.../6232.device.zip

Hi,

i have shared my project, Kindly go through it.

RE: NRF Toolbox with NRF52 Eval Board

Vidar Berg — Tue, 23 Feb 2021 08:12:38 GMT

Hi,

Maybe it's a different issue then. Are you able to share your project here so I can take a look?

RE: NRF Toolbox with NRF52 Eval Board

saravana0210 — Tue, 23 Feb 2021 06:30:12 GMT

hi,

I tried disabling the UART legacy support and also followed the link which you shared but still same issue.

RE: NRF Toolbox with NRF52 Eval Board

Vidar Berg — Mon, 22 Feb 2021 14:33:43 GMT

Hello,

Please try to disable the UART legacy support as Jørgen suggests in this post: https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/48318/multiple-definition-of-uarte0_uart0_irqhandler. This should fix the multiple definition error you're getting for the IRQ handler.

Best regards,

Vidar