<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>DFU over BLE messing up Mesh provisioning</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/72413/dfu-over-ble-messing-up-mesh-provisioning</link><description>Hello all, 
 
 We are trying to implement coexistence between BLE and Bluetooth mesh. 
 After following the Nordic coexistence tutorials, our program builds fine using both SDKs and it seems to run fine; no runtime errors. The issue seems to be performance</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2021 15:20:54 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/72413/dfu-over-ble-messing-up-mesh-provisioning" /><item><title>RE: DFU over BLE messing up Mesh provisioning</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/298156?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2021 15:20:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:436e3817-b04e-4ab6-93d2-c29430d0ba99</guid><dc:creator>Hung Bui</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Char,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Please clarify the following. You mentioned that you avoid using DFU over mesh but you still have DFU supported, which DFU method is that&amp;nbsp; ?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You also mentioned that you use Mesh app for mobile provision, so you still have PB-GATT (provision via a phone connection ) supported ?&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;How about your own BLE profile, do you also have that running ? What&amp;#39;s the functionality of that ?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Please be aware that having DFU over mesh supported doesn&amp;#39;t affect mesh performance when DFU process is not in place. Even with DFU process in place, mesh should still work at at least 90% of the performance as there is no change in the scanning&amp;nbsp;(still do normal Mesh scanning) and the sending of DFU packets are at very low rate..&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>