<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>question 9160 DS</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/72984/question-9160-ds</link><description>Question 1: 
 The nRF9160 datasheet V2.0 claims the sensitivity is: CATM=-108dBm (mid band); NBIOT=-114dBm (mid band). 
 However when the unit connects, we get a printout for the RSRP=-130dBm 
 How could we get this number for the RSRP if we are below</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2021 10:27:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/72984/question-9160-ds" /><item><title>RE: question 9160 DS</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/301157?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2021 10:27:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:18cdd83d-40d0-46db-b4c1-8555b4d22edb</guid><dc:creator>Stian R&amp;#248;ed Hafskjold</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Response for question 1:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In practice nRF9160 RF sensitivity is better then what we state in PS. RSRP -130dBm is within possibilities.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: question 9160 DS</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/300935?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2021 13:03:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:47fb9fed-a465-411f-94ca-f6f75cf759df</guid><dc:creator>Stian R&amp;#248;ed Hafskjold</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Question 1:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I forwarded your request to the modem team. Will let you know when I get a response.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Question 2:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Check out my last answer in ticket #266448. Please continue the discussion in the other ticket if something is unclear.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
[quote user=""]The numbers in the NORDIC calculator are “too good to be true”[/quote]
&lt;p&gt;Please elaborate. The numbers are based on real measurements on the nRF9160 and should be fairly realistic. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards,&lt;br /&gt;Stian&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>