<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Huge difference on the results on measurements of different PPK firmwares.</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/73313/huge-difference-on-the-results-on-measurements-of-different-ppk-firmwares</link><description>Hello, We are about to release a Firmware update for our vibration sensors and we are now testing the consumption of the new firmware. Our sensor is a nRF51822 + Accelerometer + CR2477. On the previous firmware version we were using TWI to communicate</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2021 07:05:00 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/73313/huge-difference-on-the-results-on-measurements-of-different-ppk-firmwares" /><item><title>RE: Huge difference on the results on measurements of different PPK firmwares.</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/302489?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2021 07:05:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:abed221d-22d4-49a1-957e-470aba8e91bf</guid><dc:creator>&amp;#216;yvind</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Also, can you provide a screenshot of the whole Power Profile window to include all settings that you are using? In v3.1.1 are you enabling averaging? Please disable this and do a measurement with highest possible frequency in v3.1.1.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In v3.0.3 the averaging button is not available, and this may be the root cause for the difference. To enable &amp;quot;Save / Export&amp;quot; in v3.0.3, you can use CTRL+ALT+SHIFT+L.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Unfortunately, downgrading (roll back) the Power Profiler app is not a straight forward task. Will get back to you on that one.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;-Øyvind&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Huge difference on the results on measurements of different PPK firmwares.</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/302485?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2021 06:47:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:39a92b17-d9c6-48bb-8bb9-e7a17b2930ba</guid><dc:creator>&amp;#216;yvind</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;ve talked to our SW team to check if there are any changes in the Power Profiler app. They ask you to use &amp;quot;Shift + Left click and drag&amp;quot; to mark the area of interest. Then click on &amp;quot;Save / Export&amp;quot; and save it as a .ppk file. Please do this for both measurements.&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Let me know if anything is unclear.&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Kind regards,&lt;br /&gt;Øyvind&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Huge difference on the results on measurements of different PPK firmwares.</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/302413?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2021 14:38:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:713160c4-1927-4e1f-a4f0-4f55060e0066</guid><dc:creator>C&amp;#225;ssio Miranda Coelho Barbosa</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello &lt;span&gt;&amp;Oslash;yvind&lt;/span&gt;,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span&gt;Our sensor is a nRF51822 + Accelerometer(KX122) + CR2477.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;We are using a regular 15cm micro USB cable. No hubs.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The only difference is the version of the power profiler Kit.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Over the weekend we continued to run some tests trying to eliminate variables and the results are still the same.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks for helping us!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Huge difference on the results on measurements of different PPK firmwares.</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/302371?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2021 13:07:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:1f4a2679-86a2-4dd9-8e6e-80ce2cc8f887</guid><dc:creator>&amp;#216;yvind</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Due to Easter holiday we are currently lower staffed than usual, and some extra time must be expected to provide an answer. We apologize for the inconvenience this may cause.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Are you using nRF51 or nRF52?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Can you please provide more information on the test setup you are using?&amp;nbsp; What kind of USB cables are you using? Are you connecting through a USB hub?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thank you.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Kind regards,&lt;br /&gt;Øyvind&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>