<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>High power consumption when running the BLE stack.</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/74092/high-power-consumption-when-running-the-ble-stack</link><description>There is no &amp;#39;low BLE power&amp;#39; example in the nRFConnect SDK for the nRF5340 - so I am just &amp;#39;trying thinks&amp;#39; based on documentation I can find to come up with Application/BLE configuration that is low power. My expectation for low power when the BLE stack</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2021 12:11:48 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/74092/high-power-consumption-when-running-the-ble-stack" /><item><title>RE: High power consumption when running the BLE stack.</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/306535?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2021 12:11:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:0a1813b8-0051-4920-8f22-5daea72a24f8</guid><dc:creator>johntaylor2</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks!&amp;nbsp; This did the trick.&amp;nbsp; My new power usage is:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Average Current: &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; ~11uA&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Peak Current:&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; ~14mA&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/4/pastedimage1619179903320v1.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: High power consumption when running the BLE stack.</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/306524?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2021 11:49:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:588d5a3d-3637-4d26-9d75-0fc9f26fd0d7</guid><dc:creator>J&amp;#248;rgen Holmefjord</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi again,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You need to disable serial and logging for the child image (hci_rpmsg) in order to reduce the base current on the network core. This can be done by adding a configuration file as described on &lt;a href="https://developer.nordicsemi.com/nRF_Connect_SDK/doc/1.5.1/nrf/ug_nrf5340.html?highlight=child_image#configuration-of-network-samples"&gt;this page&lt;/a&gt;, or you can modify the conf-file directly in the hci_rpmsg sample directory:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/4/7827.prj.conf"&gt;devzone.nordicsemi.com/.../7827.prj.conf&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I tested this with the peripheral_lbs sample, together with the prj_minimal.conf file, and I&amp;#39;m then seeing ~90uA average current on the nRF5340 DK.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best regards,&lt;br /&gt;Jørgen&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: High power consumption when running the BLE stack.</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/305631?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2021 15:50:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:3a7be2cd-8b8b-4676-ac87-3c632a669c88</guid><dc:creator>J&amp;#248;rgen Holmefjord</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m checking internally if we have any low-power examples for nRF5340. In general, the current consumption of nRF53 should be comparable to nRF52 series, so your numbers seems quite high.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I will get back to you as soon as I have more information to share.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best regards,&lt;br /&gt;Jørgen&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>