<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Gazell Datarate Seems Very Low</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/745/gazell-datarate-seems-very-low</link><description>Hello, 
 I&amp;#39;ve modified some of the gazelle sample code and I&amp;#39;ve been testing the throughput. I am basically using all the default settings and I&amp;#39;m seeing throughput of 43Kbps. I test this by setting a GPIO just before I add a packet to the TX fifo, then</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Oct 2013 21:43:39 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/745/gazell-datarate-seems-very-low" /><item><title>RE: Gazell Datarate Seems Very Low</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/3786?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 28 Oct 2013 21:43:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:b0b436c8-e53c-4bf2-a23a-01018dc0afd0</guid><dc:creator>Charles Horkin</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Understood, but are you suggesting that there is a 1000% overhead?  I&amp;#39;m only at 1/10th of the on-air data rate.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Gazell Datarate Seems Very Low</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/3788?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Sat, 26 Oct 2013 15:14:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:9592bd3f-30a4-40aa-b78f-20cfa6f2ef3c</guid><dc:creator>ovrebekk</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Just a brief comment Charles, 2 Mbps is the on-air data rate. Regardless of what protocol you use the practical data rate will always be lower, because of overhead in the packet (preamble, address, length field and CRC), radio startup times and so forth.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Gazell Datarate Seems Very Low</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/3787?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2013 22:10:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:137f93d4-2141-44cb-985d-9620ca00828c</guid><dc:creator>Charles Horkin</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;After much experimenting, I found that if I reduce the channel table to 2 (cut in half), my data rate doubles.  When I go to a single channel, I see 200Kbps.  Still not up to the advertised 2Mbps&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>