<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>a way to optimize signal strength</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/7499/a-way-to-optimize-signal-strength</link><description>hi, i&amp;#39;m trying to develop a wearable health device.
actually, the device is a little unusual because it is attached to the Armpit or sole of the foot or inside knee .. 
 the problem is signal strength is very weak after attached. ( -85dbm under ) </description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2015 06:26:51 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/7499/a-way-to-optimize-signal-strength" /><item><title>RE: a way to optimize signal strength</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/26667?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2015 06:26:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:a4cb7855-94a0-4cc7-95b4-4b031ed1dc7c</guid><dc:creator>&amp;#216;yvind Karlsen</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As Dave pointed out, matching the antenna for the use-case scenario is your best bet. If you are looking for help with implementation, you should find this blogpost on &lt;a href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/blogs/655/general-pcb-design-guidelines-for-nrf51/"&gt;General PCB design guidelines for nRF51&lt;/a&gt; useful, particularily the part on tuning and selecting antenna. Also the white paper on  &lt;a href="https://www.nordicsemi.com/eng/nordic/download_resource/20347/4/95023480"&gt;Antenna Tuning&lt;/a&gt; might be useful.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In addition to the antennas mentioned in the blogpost you also have the opportunity to use larger directional antennas such as a yagi-derivative, or a parabola, however I suspect you might be limited by size constraints.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: a way to optimize signal strength</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/26666?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2015 17:33:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:6735d7e2-c47f-4c1b-9435-4c425bac43a0</guid><dc:creator>Dave_couling</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;You can tune your antenna to compensate for the detuning that proximity to the human body will cause.  However the body will still absorb signal.  You best bet is  a width bandwidth antenna that you can place as far away from the body as possible.  Using a more directional antenna can help to as you can direct the signal away from the body.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>