<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Security level mismatch between between nRF Connect and nRF52832 / LESC Bonding with numeric comparison</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/76416/security-level-mismatch-between-between-nrf-connect-and-nrf52832-lesc-bonding-with-numeric-comparison</link><description>Hi, 
 we are bonding an nRF52832 (SDK version 17.0.2, Softdevice S132 7.2.0, using the Peer Manager) and nRF Connect (Desktop, version 2.5.1) using numeric comparison method. Afterwards it looks like the information about the security level after bonding</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2021 12:40:38 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/76416/security-level-mismatch-between-between-nrf-connect-and-nrf52832-lesc-bonding-with-numeric-comparison" /><item><title>RE: Security level mismatch between between nRF Connect and nRF52832 / LESC Bonding with numeric comparison</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/316072?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2021 12:40:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:d07b0e26-6051-48be-b774-fba35e4de482</guid><dc:creator>Kubalaf</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Hung,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I adapted the multirole LESC example to run on our HW (as I do not have a PCA10040 yet and our HW does not have buttons and leds) and the behavior was the same. During further investigation I had a look on the dongle I am using for the PC. It was an older PCA10031. After I replaced it with a PCA10059 dongle, the behavior is as expected (security mode 1 level 4 on each reconnect).&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks for your help, this issue is solved.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Security level mismatch between between nRF Connect and nRF52832 / LESC Bonding with numeric comparison</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/315925?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2021 14:28:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:c4c1b6df-c7dc-4fb1-86b9-fac228e36bae</guid><dc:creator>Hung Bui</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Florian,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It looked quite strange to me. Could you please try testing again using our example&amp;nbsp;\examples\ble_central_and_peripheral\experimental\ble_app_multirole_lesc\&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The example use LESC and numeric comparison.&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;This is what I&amp;nbsp;got when testing with the example, they are all mode 1 level 4 when re-connected:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img alt=" " src="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/resized-image/__size/613x270/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/4/3704.pastedimage1623940124877v2.png" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If it only happened in your application, please send a minimum version of the application that can re-produce the issue.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>