<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>NRF52832 BLE Certification under ETSI EN 300 328 V2.2.2</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/76565/nrf52832-ble-certification-under-etsi-en-300-328-v2-2-2</link><description>Hello 
 We have developped a product with the nRF52832. Due to space restrictions we couldn&amp;#39;t use the PCB antenna design from the nRF 52DK. We used an Johanson chip antenna instead. We would now make the regulatory RF tests of the complete system. Our</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2021 11:42:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/76565/nrf52832-ble-certification-under-etsi-en-300-328-v2-2-2" /><item><title>RE: NRF52832 BLE Certification under ETSI EN 300 328 V2.2.2</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/316702?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2021 11:42:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:41cd683d-eece-4f9a-b704-2239eec05fbb</guid><dc:creator>ketiljo</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Erick&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The only difference between V2.1.1 and V2.2.2 is the receiver blocking test. The test levels are different. All other tests and parameters are the same. So you should be able to get away with most from the V2.1.1&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We don&amp;#39;t have any newer reports for the nRF52-DK, sorry.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;best regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ketil Aas-Johansen&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>