<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>softdevice vs zephyr</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/76967/softdevice-vs-zephyr</link><description>My question is very simples. If I have to start with a new design, is better for me to use the softdevice implementation or is better to use the zephyr once ? 
 The evolution in the next 5 years will be move in the zephyr direction or in the softdevice</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2021 14:07:07 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/76967/softdevice-vs-zephyr" /><item><title>RE: softdevice vs zephyr</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/318262?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2021 14:07:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:7c2ed4e7-4687-4e40-b51f-68e997741ddd</guid><dc:creator>Kenneth</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I recommend nRF Connect SDK (zephyr based). This is the common SDK platform for nRF52, nRF53 and nRF91.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Kenneth&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>