<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>LFCLK source using internal RC or external crystal ?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/77426/lfclk-source-using-internal-rc-or-external-crystal</link><description>Hi Nordic DevTeam, 
 What I have learned from this thread below is that using 32kHz external crystal provides less power consumption and better accuracy : 
 https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/9566/external-32-768-khz-crystal-vs-internal-rc-oscillator</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2021 12:53:04 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/77426/lfclk-source-using-internal-rc-or-external-crystal" /><item><title>RE: LFCLK source using internal RC or external crystal ?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/319797?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2021 12:53:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:eec7c3dc-88a0-4e48-9d90-7eeeb98ca4f9</guid><dc:creator>JONATHAN LL</dc:creator><description>[quote user=""]From what I understand is that the BLE and UART implementation is based on HFCLK (32MHz crystal is already embedded for this), is this correct?[/quote]
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;Correct.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
[quote user=""]&amp;quot;The LFRC frequency will be affected by variation in temperature.&amp;quot;?[/quote]
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;This will also be true for a external crystal. We don&amp;#39;t have a&amp;nbsp;detailed chart on the variation.&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Any LF source can be used for RTC it will only effect the accuracy and power consumption. So for a device wit out a LFXO you can still use the LFRC to get RTC for example.&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In short; If you don&amp;#39;t care about getting the lowest power consumption then having the external LF crystal is not that important.&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Also you can request a schematic and layout review here on DevZone if you like. Just create a new ticket and name it &lt;strong&gt;HW review nRFXX&lt;/strong&gt; and we will give you feedback.&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Regards,&lt;br /&gt;Jonathan&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>