<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Why nRF52832 and nRF52833 as center connect peripherals often fails?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/77533/why-nrf52832-and-nrf52833-as-center-connect-peripherals-often-fails</link><description>Hi, Nordic 
 This is the test result that I use nRF52833 as the host to connect the slave, slave txpower = 0dbm. 
 
 And use Wireshart Sniffer to grab the air packet when it fails. 
 
 It looks like update MTU failed. 
 We cannot accept the failure rate</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2021 13:38:08 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/77533/why-nrf52832-and-nrf52833-as-center-connect-peripherals-often-fails" /><item><title>RE: Why nRF52832 and nRF52833 as center connect peripherals often fails?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/320285?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2021 13:38:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:56a42a24-fcee-45e2-986b-409a694d82eb</guid><dc:creator>Hung Bui</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Luojing,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What you showed in the sniffer trace suggest that the CONNECT_REQ was not received by the peripheral, hence the connection was not established.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There could be many factors that can cause such result:&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;- Not optimized hardware. Please make sure the hardware board is tuned. You can use the nRF52 DK as the reference for testing.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;-&amp;nbsp;Collision in the air traffic. Please check if there is any other 2.4GHz activity in the area, for example wifi, other advertisers.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- Is there any other activity on the peripheral ? If the peripheral would need to do advertising, it won&amp;#39;t be able to scan at the same time.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- It&amp;#39;s impossible to have 0 error with RF on an open environment. Theoretically, you can only achieve success rate of 100% when you test in a RF chamber or using a wired antenna.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You can consider increase the TX Power of the central to +4dBm or +8dBm if needed, this would increase the signal strength and reduce the error rate.&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Note that in indoor environment, it&amp;#39;s quite normal to see packet drops at 10m.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>