<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Optional SMA Footprint</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/7951/optional-sma-footprint</link><description>Hello, 
 I am basing a design on the reference design from the nRF-DK (pca10028?). I am trying to understand the implications of using an SMA connector footprint for testing purposes, but including a cuttable trace underneath the SMA connector making</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2015 12:17:57 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/7951/optional-sma-footprint" /><item><title>RE: Optional SMA Footprint</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/28449?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2015 12:17:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:bc3cc256-2416-4a50-9db8-137649e2941b</guid><dc:creator>&amp;#216;yvind Karlsen</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Alex,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you&amp;#39;re thinking about the nRF51 development kit, the antenna is always there. There&amp;#39;s a coaxial connector with switch being used, you can place a probe/cable into it and it will switch the signal path onto the connector, bypassing the antenna.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We found this to be an easy way to debug the development kit, it is possible to do what you&amp;#39;re suggesting as well, but it will affect RF performance. If you&amp;#39;re making a device I would recommend soldering onto the antenna output and cutting away the connection to the antenna.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You can definitely send in your design for review by our support team engineers, we also offer help with tuning. If you prefer you can post it here and we&amp;#39;ll do our best to help you.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Øyvind&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Optional SMA Footprint</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/28448?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2015 19:44:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:919e82cc-e5de-4cfe-b7c8-5e9c8ef24ef2</guid><dc:creator>chalecampb</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Should also point out that I have read both nWP-017 and the λ/4 printed monopole antenna for 2.45GHz document (thanks for those!). Neither mentioned the use of an SMA connector for testing if it would be left off during production.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>