<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>About nRF52840 RF reception sensitivity issues</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/80105/about-nrf52840-rf-reception-sensitivity-issues</link><description>At 1M rate, test the reception sensitivity of Bluetooth chip, the number of packets lost at -90dBm exceeded 30.8% as specified by Bluetooth Alliance, and this situation occurred in 10 of the 25 chips tested, in the same test environment. At the same time</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2021 19:32:49 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/80105/about-nrf52840-rf-reception-sensitivity-issues" /><item><title>RE: About nRF52840 RF reception sensitivity issues</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/331793?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2021 19:32:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:bceef135-4abb-4477-817f-76c1c2360a01</guid><dc:creator>Kenneth</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Have you verified using a spectrum analyser that the output power is within specifications on the design?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Have you measured the frequency accuracy of the carrier?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Are you taking into account loss in connectors and cables when you write -90dBm?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Can you measure&amp;nbsp;the packet loss at several attenuation levels? For instance -88, -90, and -92dBm?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>