<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Bluetooth licensing fees?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/8304/bluetooth-licensing-fees</link><description>Is there a way to avoid fees, and still use BLE? Do I need to change UUIDs or leave them be? 
 If not can the nrf51822 be used to just use the pure 2.4 ghz protocol and DFU at the same time? Or is DFU BLE based? It is not crucial that we use BLE, just</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2016 13:39:11 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/8304/bluetooth-licensing-fees" /><item><title>RE: Bluetooth licensing fees?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/29997?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2016 13:39:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:3a05ee60-bac9-4240-bf3c-cd8a56cf56ed</guid><dc:creator>Jens Jespersen</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Øyvind - are you sure about this ?
I&amp;#39;m quite sure, that you don&amp;#39;t have to comply with FCC and IC unless you want to use your product in US/Canada.
Whether you are using bluetooth or &amp;quot;just&amp;quot; another radio, you have to comply with R&amp;amp;TTE (which by the way is changed later this year to RE)
A way to make certification cheeper is to use a radiomodule that has been tested. Then the certification should be easier.
Jens&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Bluetooth licensing fees?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/29998?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2016 12:42:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:48dc23a5-8946-452e-b19f-0d4243fe7380</guid><dc:creator>Menno</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Perhaps this is a silly question but we are not planning on selling our products but &lt;strong&gt;lease&lt;/strong&gt; them. Will we in that case still have to pay the licensing fees?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Bluetooth licensing fees?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/29996?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2015 11:01:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:83f01fb1-c48f-4ca9-99d7-9319934f9141</guid><dc:creator>Emil</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;In case I need to have builds making BLE version and a radio version, and both uses common sd_ functions like for wait for event. But I guess I can just rewrite everything to be independent from the softdevice when it comes to common functions like sd_app_event_wait() vs __WFE()...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Bluetooth licensing fees?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/29995?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2015 10:58:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:6030dd6d-a6de-4aa2-9ae0-5be7270e07a4</guid><dc:creator>&amp;#216;yvind Karlsen</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Why would you want the SoftDevice if you are not using BLE?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Bluetooth licensing fees?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/29994?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2015 10:51:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:bd2c6806-26ac-4e44-83ac-1ba160959576</guid><dc:creator>Emil</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I guess just having the softdevice there without using BLE is OK?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Bluetooth licensing fees?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/29993?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2015 13:34:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:c287a8e7-1d09-4663-9781-4a10ba950a0d</guid><dc:creator>Emil</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Ok. Thank you again for this very useful and valuable information! Good to be aware of these gotchas before proceeding further into development.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Bluetooth licensing fees?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/29992?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2015 13:33:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:379a2ab4-9f5b-413c-bea0-6b883406d154</guid><dc:creator>&amp;#216;yvind Karlsen</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Usually you will send your prototype in to a certified laboratory to do the regulatory tests, so the rates they charge will vary(I don&amp;#39;t have actual numbers for you).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Bluetooth licensing fees?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/29991?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2015 13:26:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:ad15f6af-e85b-478e-bacb-7a6d8b71b23f</guid><dc:creator>Emil</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Cool! Right now it sounds like a better option, but not sure how big that chunk is compared to the total of FCC regulatory requirements, R&amp;amp;TTE regulatory requirements and IC regulatory requirements....&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Bluetooth licensing fees?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/29990?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2015 13:24:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:fbd880d1-ad99-404c-9c6d-c5d7dca5aad1</guid><dc:creator>&amp;#216;yvind Karlsen</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;It would save you the costs, we don&amp;#39;t charge you for anything after you have bought our chip, we even offer free technical support here on devzone and at the &lt;a href="https://www.nordicsemi.com/eng/Support-Community/Contact-Support-Team"&gt;mypage support portal&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Bluetooth licensing fees?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/29989?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2015 13:20:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:d50407e5-64a7-4649-a95b-849c842b7949</guid><dc:creator>Emil</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks! But would that save me costs? Or would it incur me a secret Nordic Semiconductor fee? :)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Bluetooth licensing fees?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/29988?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2015 13:19:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:49a25416-1c68-408f-ad87-662ea595079f</guid><dc:creator>&amp;#216;yvind Karlsen</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Prices range from 2500-8000$.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You can definitely use the nRF51 in proprietary mode, have a look at the transmitter example(found in &lt;code&gt;source_folder\examples\peripheral\radio\transmitter&lt;/code&gt;) from the SDK.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Bluetooth licensing fees?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/29987?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2015 13:17:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:2057d045-bc9e-456a-93ea-134f8238edad</guid><dc:creator>Emil</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I am not sure what the price is, but can&amp;#39;t possibly be low. I don&amp;#39;t really need bluetooth, it&amp;#39;s just a convenience.  Can I use NRF51 DK to do the same as your proprietary nrf24l01+ ? Or would that cost money too?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Bluetooth licensing fees?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/29986?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2015 13:15:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:10787b3a-1344-49bf-b58d-ae3fdd2e924d</guid><dc:creator>&amp;#216;yvind Karlsen</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, you are still using Bluetooth technology, so you will need to pass compliance and certification.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Bluetooth licensing fees?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/29985?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2015 12:42:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:d1c188dd-83e7-4dfa-956a-1a469efb1a49</guid><dc:creator>gaminn</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Do I need to pass Bluetooth compliance and certification even when I&amp;#39;m not advertising the product as Bluetooth-enabled product (i.e. I don&amp;#39;t mention Bluetooth or their logo anywhere)?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Bluetooth licensing fees?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/29984?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2015 11:35:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:b9b525c4-2883-4561-b008-8ffd5fc815be</guid><dc:creator>&amp;#216;yvind Karlsen</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Emil,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To &lt;strong&gt;sell&lt;/strong&gt; a BLE product you need to comply with the following:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;p&gt;FCC regulatory requirements&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;p&gt;R&amp;amp;TTE regulatory requirements&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;p&gt;IC regulatory requirements&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bluetooth compliance and certification&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Please see the &lt;a href="http://infocenter.nordicsemi.com/topic/com.nordic.infocenter.pdf.nwp/nwp_010.pdf"&gt;Regulatory and Compliance standards whitepaper&lt;/a&gt;, for more infomation about the Bluetooth compliance and certification, see &lt;a href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/question/5148/is-ble-changing-licensing-policy/?answer=5182#post-id-5182"&gt;this post&lt;/a&gt; as well as START B on the &lt;a href="https://www.bluetooth.org/en-us/test-qualification/qualification-overview"&gt;bluetooth SIG pages&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;DFU is using our BLE stack, so it is not possible to utilize this service without using our SoftDevices. However it is possible to implement your own proprietary protocol that includes support for over-the-air firmware updates.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You can definitely create a proprietary protocol, and this would make you avoid the fees to Bluetooth SIG, however you still need to comply with the regulatory requirements.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Øyvind&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>