<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>using Softdevice S140 7.3.0 with nRF5 SDK 17.1.0 and nRF52840</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/84689/using-softdevice-s140-7-3-0-with-nrf5-sdk-17-1-0-and-nrf52840</link><description>I have an nRF52840 + nRF5 SDK 17.1.0 project that has been running on S140 7.2.0 and we&amp;#39;re getting ready to lock some things in. But we happened to notice that there is a newer S140 - version 7.3.0. While we still can, I wanted to test it out to see if</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2022 08:18:33 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/84689/using-softdevice-s140-7-3-0-with-nrf5-sdk-17-1-0-and-nrf52840" /><item><title>RE: using Softdevice S140 7.3.0 with nRF5 SDK 17.1.0 and nRF52840</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/352811?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2022 08:18:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:cb6ef3dd-a0a5-479f-b5cd-39bc236ff55c</guid><dc:creator>Sigurd</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
[quote user=""]Does the new Softdevice&amp;#39;s include directory intentionally not include nrf_sd_def.h?[/quote]
&lt;p&gt;Yes. The file &amp;quot;&lt;span&gt;nrf_sd_def.h&amp;quot; is something that the SDK adds, not part of the &amp;quot;stand-alone&amp;quot; SD download.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
[quote user=""]I got it compiling by copying the old nrf_sd_def.h file into the new Softdevice&amp;#39;s include directory. Should I have to do this?[/quote]
&lt;p&gt;Yes, that&amp;#39;s the correct approach.&lt;/p&gt;
[quote user=""]Should I be taking a different approach to using the new Softdevice?[/quote]
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;No.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
[quote user=""]Maybe I should simply swap out the Softdevice hex files instead of trying to use the headers that came with the new Softdevice?[/quote]
&lt;p&gt;No, update the headers and replace the hex file is the correct approach.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>