<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Public vs. Random Static Device Address</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/84901/public-vs-random-static-device-address</link><description>Hey 
 what are the downsides of using the already burned-in Random Static Device Address compared to a Public Address? 
 My assumptions are as follows: 
 
 
 
 
 Pro 
 Con 
 
 
 Public 
 Is a registered IEEE address and there should not be collisions</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2022 08:38:09 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/84901/public-vs-random-static-device-address" /><item><title>RE: Public vs. Random Static Device Address</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/353776?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2022 08:38:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:33f0022d-aec6-47c1-859f-4818cebf4da7</guid><dc:creator>Emil Lenngren</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;ve listed some more reasons at&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://stackoverflow.com/a/70181575/556495"&gt;https://stackoverflow.com/a/70181575/556495&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you want to connect from Android, it has the issue in its API that the address type cannot be set when connecting. It instead uses heuristics to &amp;quot;guess&amp;quot; the address type, which works by checking a list of previously scanned devices as well as bonded devices. If not found, it usually defaults to Public address type.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One good thing with public addresses is that you get an address range for your products which can be nice to have in some circumstances.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Public vs. Random Static Device Address</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/353758?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2022 07:28:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:2929add5-5f28-44b9-b2ab-44980c57ec06</guid><dc:creator>Einar Thorsrud</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is no practical issue with using&amp;nbsp;the default random static address from FICR. With 46 bits, the likelihood of a collision is &lt;em&gt;extremely&lt;/em&gt; low (see &lt;a href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/58067/does-nrf52840-on-thingy-91-has-unique-mac-address/235541#235541"&gt;this post&lt;/a&gt;).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>