<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Compatibility of SoftDevice S140 v7.0.1 and v7.2.0</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/85018/compatibility-of-softdevice-s140-v7-0-1-and-v7-2-0</link><description>Hi 
 
 We are now using SDK v17.0.0 for our product and planning to upgrade SDK v17.0.2 because SDK v17.0.0 could no longer be downloaded. 
 But SoftDevice for each SDK is: 
 
 SDK v17.0.0 : SoftDevice v7.0.1 
 SDK v17.0.2 : SoftDevice v7.2.0 
 
 https</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2022 12:01:09 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/85018/compatibility-of-softdevice-s140-v7-0-1-and-v7-2-0" /><item><title>RE: Compatibility of SoftDevice S140 v7.0.1 and v7.2.0</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/356561?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2022 12:01:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:f1c69c2a-32c3-4adf-aa78-0ad1f242dbf1</guid><dc:creator>ovrebekk</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the clarification. If you do decide to use the older SoftDevice version make sure to test your application well before deployment.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best regards&lt;br /&gt;Torbjørn&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Compatibility of SoftDevice S140 v7.0.1 and v7.2.0</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/354983?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2022 10:16:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:a3ac2adc-5a17-4cfc-92c4-667adf421f45</guid><dc:creator>yoshiki.sato</dc:creator><description>&lt;p class="p1"&gt;I understood. Thank you.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class="p2"&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class="p1"&gt;&amp;gt; I would definitely recommend using an officially supported SDK and SoftDevice combination though, which is why I asked if using S140 v7.2.0 is a possibility.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class="p2"&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class="p1"&gt;It is difficult to use S140 v7.2.0 because update procedure for our products updates only the application, not the SoftDevice.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Compatibility of SoftDevice S140 v7.0.1 and v7.2.0</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/354896?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2022 21:37:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:af40be8f-bf4a-4b83-b354-1a81d82ef151</guid><dc:creator>ovrebekk</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The compatibility matrix doesn&amp;#39;t necessarily show all possible SDK and SoftDevice combinations, just those that have been properly tested.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I would definitely recommend using an officially supported SDK and SoftDevice combination though, which is why I asked if using S140 v7.2.0 is a possibility.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best regards&lt;br /&gt;Torbjørn&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Compatibility of SoftDevice S140 v7.0.1 and v7.2.0</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/354704?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2022 01:50:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:426c5f28-2607-469e-b3b6-9e07ef706eca</guid><dc:creator>yoshiki.sato</dc:creator><description>&lt;p class="p1"&gt;Thank you for the reply.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class="p1"&gt;I understand that SDK v17.0.2 can be used with S140 v7.0.1.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class="p2"&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class="p1"&gt;But why doesn&amp;#39;t the Compatibility Matrix show this compatibility?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class="p1"&gt;&lt;a href="https://infocenter.nordicsemi.com/index.jsp?topic=%2Fcomp_matrix_nrf52840%2FCOMP%2Fnrf52840%2FnRF52840_ic_rev_sdk_sd_comp_matrix.html"&gt;infocenter.nordicsemi.com/index.jsp&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class="p2"&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class="p1"&gt;Best regards&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Compatibility of SoftDevice S140 v7.0.1 and v7.2.0</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/354558?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2022 12:27:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:b7eaa221-9730-4284-8cf0-3f5728a23253</guid><dc:creator>ovrebekk</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It should be possible to use SDK v17.0.2 with S140 v7.0.1, yes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Have you considered upgrading both the SDK and the SoftDevice, so that you can use S140 v7.2.0 instead?&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;As the note points out this should not require any changes to the application.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best regards&lt;br /&gt;Torbjørn&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>