<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Throughput sample project slow speeds</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/85703/throughput-sample-project-slow-speeds</link><description>I am running the throughput sample project on sdk 1.9.0 using two nRF5340 dev kits and am getting a throughput of 197 kbps using 2M PHY, Data Length 251 and Interval of 7.5ms. According to the specifications from https://www.novelbits.io/bluetooth-5-speed</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2022 16:05:24 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/85703/throughput-sample-project-slow-speeds" /><item><title>RE: Throughput sample project slow speeds</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/358488?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2022 16:05:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:659cf0e5-6072-4ec7-8476-26e3c431c015</guid><dc:creator>haakonsh</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;A PCBA between the dk&amp;#39;s will definitley reduce the throughput considerably, as the signal will not have to rely on reflections from nearby walls in order to reach the peer&amp;#39;s antenna.&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;At 1292kbps you are very close to the theoretical maximum (at zero range), but the throughput will fall drastically as you increase range. 300kbps is what I&amp;#39;d expect across a large office space filled with other 2.4GHz radios like wireless headphones, wifi devices, etc.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Throughput sample project slow speeds</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/358059?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2022 17:09:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:6e1e986e-3e0a-4300-aeb4-1a7e0665c553</guid><dc:creator>jspiller</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I was able to reach 1292 kbps but the boards require no distance between them nor any obstructions. Does this seem correct? Even having just a dev board between them for a sniffer trace brought it down to 300kbps. It was my impression that it should have better range than this for these speeds.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Throughput sample project slow speeds</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/358052?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2022 16:33:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:e708a5e6-93b5-415f-9a56-a9820b9f79f9</guid><dc:creator>jspiller</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, here is one I just ran that gave me 294kbps. I am getting quite inconsistent results now anywhere from 200kbps to 350 kbps, but still much slower than the expected values.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/4/throughput-294kbps.pcapng"&gt;devzone.nordicsemi.com/.../throughput-294kbps.pcapng&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Throughput sample project slow speeds</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/357981?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2022 14:13:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:8164a89a-b6c7-4cb7-a218-ed2204036c8e</guid><dc:creator>haakonsh</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah, that&amp;nbsp;is way to low of a throughput. Do you have a log or a sniffer trace?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>