<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>How to achieve lowest latency RF link: bluetooth vs BLE vs sub-GHz</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/85784/how-to-achieve-lowest-latency-rf-link-bluetooth-vs-ble-vs-sub-ghz</link><description>I&amp;#39;m working on a wireless musical instrument which requires a super low latency RF link. I previously was using NRF52810 and found that the latency was too high. The complexity of the BLE stack and it&amp;#39;s transaction model increase latency. After further</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2022 13:10:56 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/85784/how-to-achieve-lowest-latency-rf-link-bluetooth-vs-ble-vs-sub-ghz" /><item><title>RE: How to achieve lowest latency RF link: bluetooth vs BLE vs sub-GHz</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/357957?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2022 13:10:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:942b26ce-b0b2-40c2-a9de-5f3883250c1e</guid><dc:creator>Kenneth</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;My suggestion is to look at LLPM:&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="https://developer.nordicsemi.com/nRF_Connect_SDK/doc/latest/nrf/samples/bluetooth/llpm/README.html"&gt;https://developer.nordicsemi.com/nRF_Connect_SDK/doc/latest/nrf/samples/bluetooth/llpm/README.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Have in mind though, that for any wireless application we can&amp;#39;t really guarantee latency, so you need to also consider how you will handle intermittent longer latency of packets due to interference.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Kenneth&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>