<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Radio Test Coded PHY Duty cycles</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/86223/radio-test-coded-phy-duty-cycles</link><description>Hi, 
 I use Radio Test in NCS. When the mode was selected to Coded PHY (lr500Kbit, lr125Kbit), it was found that the measured duty cycle was significantly different. For example, sending start_duty_cycle_modulated_tx 80 will result in about 50% duty.</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2022 12:21:20 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/86223/radio-test-coded-phy-duty-cycles" /><item><title>RE: Radio Test Coded PHY Duty cycles</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/359993?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2022 12:21:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:e96a596d-065f-4024-93d9-17746554b507</guid><dc:creator>Kenneth</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have reported it internally, let me know if you have new findings in the meantime.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Kenneth&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>