<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>nRF52832 (on a ublox NINA B112): Sampling via SAADC unreliable in certain conditions</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/86623/nrf52832-on-a-ublox-nina-b112-sampling-via-saadc-unreliable-in-certain-conditions</link><description>1. We use code similar to the existing sample code to repeatedly sample a 0 - 2.25V voltage range using the SAADC. 2. Settings: 30s interval, single-ended input, burst-mode, internal reference 0.6V, triggered via PPI or by MCU (doesn&amp;#39;t seem to matter</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2022 11:22:52 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/86623/nrf52832-on-a-ublox-nina-b112-sampling-via-saadc-unreliable-in-certain-conditions" /><item><title>RE: nRF52832 (on a ublox NINA B112): Sampling via SAADC unreliable in certain conditions</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/362057?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2022 11:22:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:8cbc3109-1d62-40e6-b0da-57fc169fe349</guid><dc:creator>haakonsh</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;If the internal impedance is &amp;gt; 100kohm you need to increase the acquisition time according to Table 1 in the&amp;nbsp;&lt;a title="Acquisition time" href="https://infocenter.nordicsemi.com/topic/ps_nrf52840/saadc.html?cp=4_0_0_5_22_0_0#concept_qh3_spp_qr"&gt;Acquisition time&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;chapter.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Generally the SAADC will be less accurate during radio operation, the same is true if the HFXO is not running. That being said, I&amp;#39;ve never encountered samples that are ~25%, off as inn your case, due to the previously mentioned states.&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;One typical scenario I often encounter is when a signal source is derived from a battery that is also the main power source for the device, and the ADC signal is either a direct sample of the battery voltage or&amp;nbsp;of an N/PTC resistor voltage divider circuit. &lt;br /&gt;The issue is that the battery voltage drops as the battery cannot handle instanteneous power&amp;nbsp;loads from the radio, flash erasing, CPU, external sensors, etc.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: nRF52832 (on a ublox NINA B112): Sampling via SAADC unreliable in certain conditions</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/361847?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2022 12:45:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:ae5fd879-85c6-4e71-910d-25b3baae4b1a</guid><dc:creator>s-teak</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/members/haakonsh"&gt;haakonsh&lt;/a&gt;Thank you for your suggestion. We can almost certainly exclude *floating ground*, currently verifying the *high internal impedance* point.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Will keep you posted.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: nRF52832 (on a ublox NINA B112): Sampling via SAADC unreliable in certain conditions</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/361817?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2022 11:39:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:ea10e1cc-f537-45a9-8ffd-c5e4b791cbcc</guid><dc:creator>haakonsh</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;ve not experience the&amp;nbsp;SAADC to be that inaccurate, there&amp;#39;s something else going on here. Can you share schematics, or at least more information about the signal source?&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;My first guesses would be a floating ground or a too high internal&amp;nbsp;impedance in the signal source.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>