<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>nrf52833 documentation mistake regarding package variant CJAA</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/90108/nrf52833-documentation-mistake-regarding-package-variant-cjaa</link><description>Hi, 
 Shouldn&amp;#39;t the comparability matrix for nrf52833 on package CJAA revision 2 be with a &amp;#39;J &amp;#39;not an &amp;#39;I&amp;#39; for WLCSP 
 
 from web site 
 
 
 
 from product specification: 
 
 
 thanks 
 Dan</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2022 04:03:29 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/90108/nrf52833-documentation-mistake-regarding-package-variant-cjaa" /><item><title>RE: nrf52833 documentation mistake regarding package variant CJAA</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/377486?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2022 04:03:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:3c9cc82e-89f0-4656-99fe-7ccf6c408d34</guid><dc:creator>Karl Ylvisaker</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello Dan,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This does indeed not look quite right - I will forward this to our technical writers.&lt;br /&gt;Thank you for bringing this to our attention! :)&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Best regards,&lt;br /&gt;Karl&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>