<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>S130 and scan performance potential issue</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/9331/s130-and-scan-performance-potential-issue</link><description>Hello, 
 I use S130 with NUS style connections as central and device at same time. It works nice and performance is good but when i run scan, performance become very poor. 
 I need active scan to see any iBeacon in proximity area and / or any new potential</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2015 14:02:21 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/9331/s130-and-scan-performance-potential-issue" /><item><title>RE: S130 and scan performance potential issue</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/34455?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2015 14:02:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:1222a1a2-085f-4f60-ada1-582e019363b1</guid><dc:creator>Fabien Comte</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes that was the idea, ok i understand the limitation. I will try the observer. Thank you.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: S130 and scan performance potential issue</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/34454?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2015 09:21:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:12591c59-834f-4f51-a66f-136a0ae8cbea</guid><dc:creator>Petter Myhre</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I don&amp;#39;t understand what you mean. Are you asking if you can scan on the channels used for connections? Then the answer is no. You scan on the three advertising channels. As you may know, it is possible to advertise on one channel, but our SoftDevice does not currently support scanning on only one channel. Please see &lt;a href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/question/49420/scan-in-a-single-channel/"&gt;this&lt;/a&gt; question for more information. If I have misunderstood you, please let me know.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: S130 and scan performance potential issue</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/34453?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2015 17:03:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:88d3eaaf-5a48-41d2-be2b-496eae1708f6</guid><dc:creator>Fabien Comte</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I understand if scanning share the same radio frontend you can just work on a channel at a time. But is there any way to do a kind of passive scan (use the channels sequences of connections) because emiters will transmit on the 3 bands in this case and i will increase my probability ?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: S130 and scan performance potential issue</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/34452?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2015 14:39:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:b7c2b0de-e5b1-40f1-b1b8-b0ba4e19cf5a</guid><dc:creator>Petter Myhre</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;You only have one radio. It can either scan or handle a connection event. By setting the scan window equal to the scan interval you tell the SoftDevice to scan 100 % of the time, and more connection events will be dropped. You can read more about this in the S130 SoftDevice Specification, see &lt;a href="http://infocenter.nordicsemi.com/topic/com.nordic.infocenter.130.sds.v1.0.0/multilink_scheduling/multilink_scheduling.html?cp=2_7_2_0_11"&gt;this&lt;/a&gt;. I&amp;#39;m not sure what connection interval you are actually using, but I recommend you to try different settings and see if you can get results that fulfill your requirements.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: S130 and scan performance potential issue</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/34451?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2015 14:29:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:31bc1d88-ab40-422c-a107-990ddf35026a</guid><dc:creator>Fabien Comte</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Sorry for the answer Mr Myhre, i corrected and moved it into the question.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: S130 and scan performance potential issue</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/34450?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2015 13:32:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:22f68f10-ea5b-4198-a6e2-59ef6713e59c</guid><dc:creator>Petter Myhre</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;You are not very specific. Could you please include what connection and scan parameters you are using? What do you mean by performance? Throughput? Latency? What are your requirements? What kind of performance do you expect? What are fast scan and fast connections?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>