<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>LC3 software codec profiling on nRF5340</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/93487/lc3-software-codec-profiling-on-nrf5340</link><description>Hi 
 I was wondering why there there seems to be no information about profiling of the LC3 codec by T2. 
 Only information I found is from Karl&amp;#39;s answer here : 
 
 The rule of thumb is that the LC3 codec produces approximately ~15% CPU load when decoding</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2022 14:13:27 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/93487/lc3-software-codec-profiling-on-nrf5340" /><item><title>RE: LC3 software codec profiling on nRF5340</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/393936?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2022 14:13:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:85b3d479-06cb-49ab-9055-bc4a35cc2035</guid><dc:creator>ovrebekk</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When it comes to CPU performance the answer from Karl still stands, there haven&amp;#39;t really been any changes there.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We don&amp;#39;t have accurate benchmarks for memory consumption, but when building in debug mode we see approximately 25% RAM consumption on the gateway side, and 21% RAM consumption on the headset side, in the application core.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Flash consumption is about 52-54%.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You could test this yourself by building the LE Audio sample. If you disable debug features such as logging you should be able to reduce the memory consumption a bit.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best regards&lt;br /&gt;Torbjørn&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>