<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>nRF51822 PWM strange behavior</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/9360/nrf51822-pwm-strange-behavior</link><description>Hi. 
 I&amp;#39;m using latest version of nrf51-pwm-library to test if PWM works fine, but unfortunately, it&amp;#39;s not. I have very simple program which should fade LED from 255 to 0 in infinite loop, but instead fading, I can see LED light on 100% and then turn</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2015 18:40:19 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/9360/nrf51822-pwm-strange-behavior" /><item><title>RE: nRF51822 PWM strange behavior</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/34557?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2015 18:40:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:18ad3cf6-58cb-4dcf-887a-95dedca31607</guid><dc:creator>Vrabec</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you for detailed explanation. I already ordered nRF51822 rev. 3.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: nRF51822 PWM strange behavior</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/34556?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2015 12:14:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:2f6c811d-ba43-4200-a3a7-bda462aadbfe</guid><dc:creator>Stefan Birnir Sverrisson</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;You are correct. The compatibility matrix states that S110 8.0.0 has been tested with nRF51 second revision, but SDK 7+ has not been tested with nRF51 second revision and is not implemented for the second revision. SDK 7+ might not implement workaround for anomalies stated in the PAN document for second revision nRF51. To realize what changes has been made from second to third revision nRF51, look at the PCN document that describes that. You can see what PAN and PCN documents to look at in table 3 in the compatibility matrix.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My advise, it is easier to get a third revision nRF51, unless you mean to update existing product in the field that contains nRF51 second revision devices. Is that your situation?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: nRF51822 PWM strange behavior</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/34555?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2015 15:55:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:e6f5fa41-0fcb-4b9e-96a7-8d04a8b12e65</guid><dc:creator>Vrabec</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;In compatibility matrix (table 4) I notice, there nRF51822 2nd rev. supports S110 ver. 8.0.0 but there is SDK missing. It&amp;#39;s possible to use SDK 7+ or this version of softdevice can not be used on 2nd rev. at all?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: nRF51822 PWM strange behavior</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/34554?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2015 15:19:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:564055fc-5466-4bd9-958b-9a8ec7ba0341</guid><dc:creator>Stefan Birnir Sverrisson</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, I aggree that you have second revision nRF51 with QFAAG0 chip markings. You should use third revision nRF51 as that is compatible with SDK 7+, see the nRF51 compatibility matrix table 4&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: nRF51822 PWM strange behavior</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/34553?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2015 18:02:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:d1b255d1-0251-4473-9509-75b23810230a</guid><dc:creator>Vrabec</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m using latest SDK (9.0.0). The marking on chip is: N51822 GFAAG0 1407AV what based on compatibility matrix and forum responses seems to be 2nd revision.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: nRF51822 PWM strange behavior</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/34551?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2015 08:10:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:9c2870c2-ba83-410d-969d-a5590f5443c4</guid><dc:creator>Stefan Birnir Sverrisson</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;The latest &lt;a href="https://github.com/NordicSemiconductor/nrf51-pwm-library"&gt;nrf_pwm library&lt;/a&gt; is to use with SDK 7.0.1+. Are you using SDK 7.0.1 or later?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What are the chip laser markings on the nRF51 chip on your module? That should say something about if it is second or third revision nRF51, see the &lt;a href="http://infocenter.nordicsemi.com/topic/com.nordic.infocenter.nrf51.v1.0.0/pdflinks/nrf51_comp_matrix.html?cp=2_0"&gt;nRF51 compatibility matrix&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: nRF51822 PWM strange behavior</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/34552?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2015 16:32:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:604f923b-ec74-47c4-a7e5-d82f3b612706</guid><dc:creator>Vrabec</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m using Keil uVision. I started with latest version of PWM example through uVision&amp;#39;s Pack Installer. This works fine (I&amp;#39;m not using softdevice for now), however I read using this PWM and Softdevice at once can lead to problems. Therefore I download and import latest version of nrf_pwm. In addition, I&amp;#39;m not using DK but &lt;a href="http://www.seeedstudio.com/depot/low-power-consumption-BLE40-module-with-24GHz-PCB-antenna1628mm-p-2278.html"&gt;this&lt;/a&gt;. Hopefully my answer somehow helps.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: nRF51822 PWM strange behavior</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/34550?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2015 12:16:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:15bbdbf3-4e3c-4826-ab49-1dd322d52fa6</guid><dc:creator>Stefan Birnir Sverrisson</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Vrabec&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thank you for your question.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I can not reproduce the issue with your code, using nrf_pwm.h, SDK 7.0.1 and nRF51-DK. What SDK version and hardware are you using?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: nRF51822 PWM strange behavior</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/34549?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2015 19:09:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:c7684019-cd13-4829-95ff-d392d65308d5</guid><dc:creator>Vrabec</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I don&amp;#39;t find reason why this happened, but using nrf_pwm_noglitch solves the issue. But anyway it can be useful to know what is wrong in nfr_pwm libraby.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>