<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Maximum voltage clarification on nrf52 analog pins</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/94379/maximum-voltage-clarification-on-nrf52-analog-pins</link><description>The datasheet for the nrf52832 specifies two key constraints: 
 
 I/O pin voltage max VDD + 0.3V, min -0.3V 
 The AIN0-AIN7 inputs cannot exceed VDD, or be lower than VSS. 
 
 It seems logical that one would need to not exceed the Vf of the protection</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2022 19:24:03 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/94379/maximum-voltage-clarification-on-nrf52-analog-pins" /><item><title>RE: Maximum voltage clarification on nrf52 analog pins</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/398634?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2022 19:24:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:4c455786-3017-4cb4-a795-25126d375cdd</guid><dc:creator>jgartrel</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Jared, thank you very much for the help.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;FWIW, I tested this today on an nrf52840 with&amp;nbsp;&lt;span&gt;input range configured as (0.6 V)/(1/6). I seemed to get quite accurate results&amp;nbsp;when the external pin voltage was in the range of VDD to VDD+0.15V (no difference in the normal error margin in that range).&amp;nbsp; All values measured were in the range of VDD to VDD+0.15V.&amp;nbsp; I did not test it beyond&amp;nbsp;VDD+0.15V.&amp;nbsp; The nrf52840 still seems to be in a healthy working condition.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Maximum voltage clarification on nrf52 analog pins</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/398593?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2022 15:06:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:1f320370-51a6-4216-a117-4bb8423bd9a0</guid><dc:creator>Jared</dc:creator><description>[quote user="jgartrel"]&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;the SAADC input range is configured as (VDD/4)/(1/4), I should reliably read 2.5V (max value) from the SAADC, correct?&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;[/quote]
&lt;p&gt;Correct.&lt;/p&gt;
[quote user="jgartrel"]If the SAADC input range is configured as (0.6 V)/(1/6), I should reliably read a value between 2.5V and 2.7V, but that value will become increasingly inaccurate as the voltage to the pin approaches the 0.3 V threshold of the ESD protection, correct? Does unreliable mean the SAADC would ever&amp;nbsp;report a value below 2.5V?[/quote]
&lt;p&gt;No, you&amp;#39;ll still be limited by VDD = 2V5. You can not read a value reliably that is over VDD or under VSS. Unreliable means that we can&amp;#39;t be sure what the SAADC will return, This also means that I can&amp;#39;t answer whether the SAADC will report a value under 2.5V when you measure a value over VDD. Most probably not, but I&amp;#39;m not sure If we have tested it, since it&amp;#39;s outside the specification.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;regards&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Jared&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Maximum voltage clarification on nrf52 analog pins</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/398384?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2022 15:24:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:d09cd09d-1438-4868-84ec-a6df02891b59</guid><dc:creator>jgartrel</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Perfect, thank you!.&amp;nbsp; But that leads to a follow up question:&amp;nbsp;can you clarify what you mean by&amp;nbsp;unreliable?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So, in a scenario where VDD = 2.5V and 2.7V is applied to the pin ( which should be safe ),&amp;nbsp;and:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;the SAADC input range is configured as (VDD/4)/(1/4), I should reliably read 2.5V (max value) from the SAADC, correct?&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;If the SAADC input range is configured as (0.6 V)/(1/6), I should reliably read a value between 2.5V and 2.7V, but that value will become increasingly inaccurate as the voltage to the pin approaches the 0.3 V threshold of the ESD protection, correct? Does unreliable mean the SAADC would ever&amp;nbsp;report a value below 2.5V?&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Maximum voltage clarification on nrf52 analog pins</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/398340?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2022 13:14:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:47453ccc-0b7e-47a8-91c3-84a9a3d06778</guid><dc:creator>Jared</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi there,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;For the measurements from the SAADC to be reliable, the input range can not exceed VDD or be lower than VSS.&lt;/p&gt;
[quote user=""]For example if VDD = 2.5V, is it OK to have a pin voltage of 2.52V for a SAADC input (AIN0-AIN7)?[/quote]
&lt;p&gt;The pin will not be damaged by this as it&amp;#39;s under the VDD + 0V3 constraint, but the measurement will not be reliable since it violates the second constraint.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;regards&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Jared&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>