GNSS sample vs Location sample

RE: GNSS sample vs Location sample

Øyvind — Mon, 02 Jan 2023 10:28:41 GMT

Hello, and happy new year!

[quote user="flau"] I think my next step will be testing the device and the DK at an open field and see if I get the same result. Maybe testing at a window ledge isn't good enough. [/quote]

Yes, please test out in field in an open area.

[quote user="AchimKraus"]Maybe, the very first step to reduce the scope of this issue would be to use a "unmodified sample app" of NCS-1.9.1 (or 2. what ever).[/quote]

Yes, this would also be my suggestion. See if the unmodified sample gives the same results.

Thanks.

-Øyvind

RE: GNSS sample vs Location sample

flau — Sat, 31 Dec 2022 16:27:24 GMT

I am running the Location sample straight from the SDK without any modification other than the overlay, Kconfig and prj.conf. I think my next step will be testing the device and the DK at an open field and see if I get the same result. Maybe testing at a window ledge isn't good enough.

RE: GNSS sample vs Location sample

Achim Kraus — Sat, 31 Dec 2022 08:45:46 GMT

> I build my own application based on the Location sample. I have to add MQTT, AWS, PWM, I2C, SPI and thread on top of the Location sample.

Maybe, the very first step to reduce the scope of this issue would be to use a "unmodified sample app" of NCS-1.9.1 (or 2. what ever).

If that runs, then it may be more an issue of the modifications for your app. Even if they compile and did work with a previous version, this doesn't mean, it must work with a newer one. It may require more work to revise these modifications according the new related samples of each extension. Nice work for the new-year vacation ;-).

RE: GNSS sample vs Location sample

flau — Fri, 30 Dec 2022 16:28:26 GMT

With the nRF9160 DK at the window ledge, I am getting similar results.

[00:29:30.498,596] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: Tracked satellites: 5, fix valid: false
[00:29:30.508,636] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 31, C/N0: 31.3, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[00:29:30.519,348] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 25, C/N0: 34.2, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[00:29:30.530,029] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 22, C/N0: 38.3, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[00:29:30.540,740] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 32, C/N0: 31.4, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[00:29:30.551,422] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 26, C/N0: 24.5, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[00:29:31.616,485] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: Tracked satellites: 5, fix valid: false
[00:29:31.626,525] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 31, C/N0: 31.3, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[00:29:31.637,207] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 25, C/N0: 34.0, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[00:29:31.647,918] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 22, C/N0: 38.6, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[00:29:31.658,599] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 32, C/N0: 31.4, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[00:29:31.669,311] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 26, C/N0: 24.9, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[00:29:32.617,858] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: Tracked satellites: 5, fix valid: false
[00:29:32.627,929] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 31, C/N0: 31.1, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[00:29:32.638,610] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 25, C/N0: 34.3, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[00:29:32.649,322] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 22, C/N0: 38.6, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[00:29:32.660,003] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 32, C/N0: 31.3, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[00:29:32.670,715] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 26, C/N0: 24.1, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[00:29:33.618,377] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: Tracked satellites: 5, fix valid: false
[00:29:33.628,448] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 31, C/N0: 31.4, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[00:29:33.639,129] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 25, C/N0: 34.3, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[00:29:33.649,841] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 22, C/N0: 38.8, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[00:29:33.660,552] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 32, C/N0: 31.1, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[00:29:33.671,264] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 26, C/N0: 24.6, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[00:29:34.618,743] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: Tracked satellites: 5, fix valid: false
[00:29:34.628,814] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 31, C/N0: 31.4, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[00:29:34.639,526] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 25, C/N0: 34.6, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[00:29:34.650,207] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 22, C/N0: 38.8, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[00:29:34.660,919] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 32, C/N0: 31.0, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[00:29:34.671,630] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 26, C/N0: 24.4, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[00:29:35.618,286] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: Tracked satellites: 5, fix valid: false

The DK has higher C/N0 comparing with the Ignion Trio antenna. But other than that, no big difference.

RE: GNSS sample vs Location sample

flau — Fri, 30 Dec 2022 14:57:13 GMT

All tests were done by placing the devices on the ledge of a 6' x 20' window where there is no building outside blocking the sky.

I have a nRF9160 DK. But that won't be a fair comparison because the DK has a much better GPS antenna. I used to have a Thingy91. But it is dead now. The power supply circuitry seems to be dead. Anyway, I can try with the DK and give you some results. Please stay tuned.

BTW, Happy New Year to all of you.

RE: GNSS sample vs Location sample

Øyvind — Fri, 30 Dec 2022 09:04:06 GMT

Can you provide some information on where you are doing you testing, i.e. the conditions around your device?

Do you have an nRF9160 DK or Thingy:91 to test with as well?

RE: GNSS sample vs Location sample

flau — Thu, 29 Dec 2022 21:19:19 GMT

I reverted the nRF9160 firmware from 1.3.3 to 1.3.2. There is no difference. I reverted again to 1.3.1. There is no difference either. The board still tracks 11-12 satellites but 0 fix. I tried another board and the result is the same. SDK is 1.9.1.

RE: GNSS sample vs Location sample

flau — Thu, 29 Dec 2022 19:03:00 GMT

I am very frustrated now. With the Location sample, my board can see and track 11-12 satellites, but still no fix. What determines a fix and provide a location?

[00:08:10.960,052] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: Tracked satellites: 11, fix valid: false
[00:08:10.970,214] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 26, C/N0: 24.7, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[00:08:10.980,926] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 20, C/N0: 24.5, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[00:08:10.991,638] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 9, C/N0: 24.3, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[00:08:11.002,319] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 6, C/N0: 24.4, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[00:08:11.013,031] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 27, C/N0: 24.5, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[00:08:11.023,742] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 19, C/N0: 24.7, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[00:08:11.034,454] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 14, C/N0: 24.4, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[00:08:11.045,166] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 10, C/N0: 23.9, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[00:08:11.055,877] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 31, C/N0: 24.2, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[00:08:11.066,589] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 4, C/N0: 24.3, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[00:08:11.077,301] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 25, C/N0: 24.4, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[00:08:12.077,301] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: Tracked satellites: 12, fix valid: false
[00:08:12.087,463] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 12, C/N0: 26.9, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[00:08:12.098,175] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 20, C/N0: 24.2, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[00:08:12.108,886] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 9, C/N0: 24.4, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[00:08:12.119,598] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 6, C/N0: 24.8, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[00:08:12.130,310] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 27, C/N0: 24.6, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[00:08:12.140,991] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 19, C/N0: 24.6, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[00:08:12.151,702] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 14, C/N0: 24.1, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[00:08:12.162,445] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 10, C/N0: 24.4, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[00:08:12.173,156] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 31, C/N0: 24.2, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[00:08:12.183,868] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 4, C/N0: 24.1, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[00:08:12.194,549] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 25, C/N0: 24.0, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[00:08:12.205,291] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 24, C/N0: 24.9, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[00:08:13.080,871] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: Tracked satellites: 12, fix valid: false
[00:08:13.091,033] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 12, C/N0: 24.4, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[00:08:13.101,745] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 18, C/N0: 26.9, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[00:08:13.112,457] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 9, C/N0: 24.5, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[00:08:13.123,168] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 7, C/N0: 25.5, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[00:08:13.133,880] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 27, C/N0: 24.4, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[00:08:13.144,592] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 19, C/N0: 24.4, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[00:08:13.155,303] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 14, C/N0: 24.4, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[00:08:13.166,015] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 10, C/N0: 24.8, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[00:08:13.176,727] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 31, C/N0: 24.5, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[00:08:13.187,438] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 4, C/N0: 24.1, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[00:08:13.198,120] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 25, C/N0: 24.1, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[00:08:13.208,831] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 24, C/N0: 24.2, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0

PLEASE HELP!!

RE: GNSS sample vs Location sample

flau — Wed, 28 Dec 2022 14:18:00 GMT

My bad. I should explain a bit more. I use the Toolchain Manager to install and uninstall SDK. There is no problem there. I build my own application based on the Location sample. I have to add MQTT, AWS, PWM, I2C, SPI and thread on top of the Location sample. All that work up to SDK 1.8.0. But with any SDK above 1.8.0, I ended up with way too many errors that I can't handle when I build the application. So I decided to roll back to 1.9.1 because that seems to give me the least errors. But still, I wasn't able to get a fix and a location with the Location sample with nothing added.

Regards,

Floyd

RE: GNSS sample vs Location sample

Øyvind — Wed, 28 Dec 2022 09:38:48 GMT

Hello,

[quote user="flau"]I started with FW 1.3.1. Maybe I should roll back to 1.3.1 instead of using 1.3.3. [/quote]

You could try, however, I don't think this will have any impact in this situation.

I asked for some help from our GNSS expert:

With the GNSS sample, by default LTE is disabled after downloading A-GPS data, but with the Location sample LTE is active at the same time. The Location library waits until the LTE RRC connection is released (which causes some delay), and after that LTE still needs to listen to paging from the network, so it's interrupting GNSS execution periodically. This of course also depends on the eDRX and PSM configuration.

[quote user="flau"]rust me, I tried 2.x.y and a lot of things broke and I figured it would take me weeks to repair my code to be able to compile successfully with 2.x.y.[/quote]

Are you using the Toolchain Manager to install the SDK? Are you not able to build GNSS sample and Location sample?

Kind regards,
Øyvind

RE: GNSS sample vs Location sample

flau — Wed, 28 Dec 2022 01:34:31 GMT

I turned on the debug messages and after a while I saw these messages.

[02:45:47.561,553] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: Tracked satellites: 6, fix valid: false
[02:45:47.571,655] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 1, C/N0: 33.8, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[02:45:47.582,305] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 30, C/N0: 21.4, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[02:45:47.592,987] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 13, C/N0: 25.2, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[02:45:47.603,668] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 14, C/N0: 30.3, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[02:45:47.614,318] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 8, C/N0: 25.4, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[02:45:47.625,000] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 17, C/N0: 27.2, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[02:45:48.561,126] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: Tracked satellites: 6, fix valid: false
[02:45:48.571,228] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 1, C/N0: 34.0, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[02:45:48.581,909] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 30, C/N0: 21.4, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[02:45:48.592,590] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 13, C/N0: 24.9, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[02:45:48.603,271] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 14, C/N0: 30.3, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[02:45:48.613,983] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 8, C/N0: 25.3, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[02:45:48.624,664] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 17, C/N0: 27.3, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[02:45:49.561,096] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: Tracked satellites: 7, fix valid: false
[02:45:49.571,197] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 1, C/N0: 34.0, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[02:45:49.581,878] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 30, C/N0: 23.3, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[02:45:49.592,559] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 13, C/N0: 24.9, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[02:45:49.603,210] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 14, C/N0: 30.6, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[02:45:49.613,891] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 8, C/N0: 25.6, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[02:45:49.624,572] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 12, C/N0: 27.5, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[02:45:49.635,253] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 17, C/N0: 27.8, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[02:45:50.561,401] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: Tracked satellites: 7, fix valid: false
[02:45:50.571,441] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 1, C/N0: 33.9, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[02:45:50.582,122] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 30, C/N0: 23.3, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[02:45:50.592,803] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 13, C/N0: 24.9, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[02:45:50.603,454] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 14, C/N0: 31.0, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[02:45:50.614,135] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 8, C/N0: 25.4, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[02:45:50.624,786] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 12, C/N0: 24.7, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[02:45:50.635,467] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 17, C/N0: 27.5, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[02:45:51.679,046] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: Tracked satellites: 7, fix valid: false
[02:45:51.689,178] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 1, C/N0: 34.1, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[02:45:51.699,859] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 30, C/N0: 22.7, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[02:45:51.710,510] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 13, C/N0: 24.6, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[02:45:51.721,191] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 14, C/N0: 31.1, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[02:45:51.731,872] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 8, C/N0: 24.9, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[02:45:51.742,553] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 12, C/N0: 24.5, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[02:45:51.753,204] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 17, C/N0: 27.5, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[02:45:52.681,732] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: Tracked satellites: 7, fix valid: false
[02:45:52.691,833] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 1, C/N0: 34.0, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[02:45:52.702,514] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 30, C/N0: 22.0, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[02:45:52.713,195] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 13, C/N0: 23.9, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[02:45:52.723,876] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 14, C/N0: 31.2, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[02:45:52.734,527] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 8, C/N0: 24.6, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[02:45:52.745,208] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 12, C/N0: 24.5, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0
[02:45:52.755,889] <dbg> location.method_gnss_print_pvt: PRN: 17, C/N0: 27.7, in fix: 0, unhealthy: 0

With the GNSS sample, I am sure I have a good fix and a good location already. Why am I not getting it with the Location sample? Am I missing something?

Regards,

Floyd

RE: GNSS sample vs Location sample

flau — Tue, 27 Dec 2022 19:10:08 GMT

The only reason I am running SDK 1.9.1 is..... lazy!! Trust me, I tried 2.x.y and a lot of things broke and I figured it would take me weeks to repair my code to be able to compile successfully with 2.x.y. So I rolled back to 1.9.1 which my code still compiles and runs. By the way, I started with SDK 1.7.0.

I started with FW 1.3.1. Maybe I should roll back to 1.3.1 instead of using 1.3.3. 🙂

I looked at both Kconfig and found a lot of differences. I doubt that I can copy the GNSS Kconfig to Location Kconfig since those config look very "GNSS sample" specific and similar parameters don't seem to exist in the Location sample. I do need the A-GPS and cellular fallback option since the device can be indoor a lot of the time. Why does the GNSS sample perform so well but the Location sample doesn't. With A-GPS, shouldn't it be even faster?

RE: GNSS sample vs Location sample

Øyvind — Tue, 27 Dec 2022 08:34:41 GMT

Hello Floyd,

Due to the Holidays our team is lower staffed than normal and some delays in our answers must be expected. We apologize for the inconvenience.

Is there a reason for why you are running nRF Connect SDK v1.9.1? Have you tested with e.g. v2.x.y? Note that modem FW 1.3.3 has not been tested with v1.9.1, only v2.1.0 and v2.2.0. Ref. Modem Firmware compatibility matrix.

That said, there really should not be any difference between the two samples when it boils down to the GNSS. The main difference is that Location samples seems to have A-GPS enabled by default.

There are some extra settings in nrf\samples\nrf9160\gnss\Kconfig compared to nrf\samples\nrf9160\location\Kconfig, perharps that could be a starting point.

Kind regards,
Øyvind