<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Timeslot API: Can application code be executed between signal handler and Softdevice event handler?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/95384/timeslot-api-can-application-code-be-executed-between-signal-handler-and-softdevice-event-handler</link><description>After ending a timeslot by returning NRF_RADIO_SIGNAL_CALLBACK_ACTION_END from the radio timeslot signal callback, the SD_EVT_IRQHandler() will be invoked, in which I will retrieve the SOC-Event NRF_EVT_RADIO_SESSION_IDLE via sd_evt_get() . 
 Is there</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2023 06:47:39 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/95384/timeslot-api-can-application-code-be-executed-between-signal-handler-and-softdevice-event-handler" /><item><title>RE: Timeslot API: Can application code be executed between signal handler and Softdevice event handler?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/403518?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2023 06:47:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:602a6b4c-6aea-4cf0-b4b9-b4c918e954dd</guid><dc:creator>m.wagner</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks. That is unfortunate, but good to know.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Timeslot API: Can application code be executed between signal handler and Softdevice event handler?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/403404?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2023 13:06:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:f6c0e4bc-4ac9-4236-89ff-2a5583c54aca</guid><dc:creator>Vidar Berg</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Unfortunately, the feedback I got from the Softdevice team after discussing your case with them was that&amp;nbsp;program execution could not be guaranteed to remain in the Softdevice during this period, even if you had&amp;nbsp;no high priority application interrupts to pre-empt the Softdevice. Thus, their advice was, as you already suggested, to not rely on your application being blocked during this 2 ms period.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Vidar&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>