<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>gzll&amp;amp;BLE,ant+&amp;amp;ble question</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/9588/gzll-ble-ant-ble-question</link><description>I have some questions about 2.4G protocol stack gazell&amp;amp;ANT+&amp;amp;BLE . 
 gzll&amp;amp;ble : 
 choose nrf51822 ，and use S130 SOFTDEVICE,then we can achieve gzll&amp;amp;ble coexitance. is that right? 
 ant+&amp;amp;ble: 
 choose nrf51422，and use S130 SOFTDEVICE, the result is</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2015 10:13:32 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/9588/gzll-ble-ant-ble-question" /><item><title>RE: gzll&amp;BLE,ant+&amp;ble question</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/35412?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2015 10:13:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:166ee455-6deb-4f17-9601-44fce4c03842</guid><dc:creator>Petter Myhre</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Correct on all counts.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>