<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>nrf9160 DK current measurement clarification. Measuring 40uA in PSM mode instead of 4uA.</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/96557/nrf9160-dk-current-measurement-clarification-measuring-40ua-in-psm-mode-instead-of-4ua</link><description>Hi there, we are currently developing on both the nrf5340 and nrf9160 DK&amp;#39;s. Both boards are intended to run at 3.6V using the PPK 2. 
 Recently however, we ran into an issue on the nrf5340 documented here . As a consequence, we added a short between VDD_nRF</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2023 11:20:26 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/96557/nrf9160-dk-current-measurement-clarification-measuring-40ua-in-psm-mode-instead-of-4ua" /><item><title>RE: nrf9160 DK current measurement clarification. Measuring 40uA in PSM mode instead of 4uA.</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/409551?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2023 11:20:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:9a8dcb6a-8fd6-451e-ae3a-e13e0dc19b24</guid><dc:creator>Bendik Heiskel</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Try using a second&amp;nbsp; PPK or bench power supply to supply VIO_REF with 3.6V.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The extra current consumption you are measuring is coming from this pull-down resistor in the VIO_REF circuit:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img style="max-height:240px;max-width:320px;" src="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/resized-image/__size/640x480/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/4/pastedimage1676287072794v1.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When using VDD_nRF as the source the this current draw is included in the current measured by the PPK.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: nrf9160 DK current measurement clarification. Measuring 40uA in PSM mode instead of 4uA.</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/409386?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2023 14:41:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:c3778981-fde7-48f0-ba6f-091079a490d2</guid><dc:creator>Frikkie Badenhorst</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;We are &lt;span&gt;measuring&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;the current in source meter mode at a 3.6V, connecting it to P22 and ground (see picture), and we short VDD_nRF and VIO_REF, so indeed we are using VDD_nRF as the source for VIO_REF. Not illustrated in the picture, as that we leave the USB cable connected, and flip the IFMCU DISCONN switch so that the interface MCU is offline.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img style="max-height:536px;max-width:402px;" height="536" src="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/resized-image/__size/804x1072/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/4/pastedimage1676038495119v1.jpeg" width="402" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We dont really understand why on the one devkit (nrf5340) it is required to short the pin, and then on the nrf9160 it is not.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: nrf9160 DK current measurement clarification. Measuring 40uA in PSM mode instead of 4uA.</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/409354?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2023 12:59:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:08d8129b-0ed7-4841-90ce-5db8a6f1fe3d</guid><dc:creator>Bendik Heiskel</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Frikkie,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Can you show a diagram of how you are measuring the current with the PPK?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;nbsp; suspect the extra current draw you are measuring is caused by using VDD_nrf as the source for VIO_REF, can you try using a external 3.6V source for VIO_REF?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bendik&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>