nrf9160 says AT commands are not found

RE: nrf9160 says AT commands are not found

helsing — Fri, 24 Feb 2023 14:33:26 GMT

[quote user="vmskrshn"]Is there a way i can not have the wrapper around the at commands?[/quote]

What makes the wrapper a problem? Maybe there is a workaround?

[quote user="vmskrshn"]I disabled at_shell but i cannot still use plain AT+CFUN=4[/quote]

How did you disable at_shell? What happens when you try this?

RE: nrf9160 says AT commands are not found

helsing — Wed, 22 Feb 2023 15:05:09 GMT

Hello Vamsi, just letting you know I have started looking into this.

RE: nrf9160 says AT commands are not found

Torje — Wed, 22 Feb 2023 10:07:21 GMT

Hey,

I don't know if theres an easy way to do it with the Modem Shell. But other samples do. You can check out the at_client sample. This does exactly that.

RE: nrf9160 says AT commands are not found

vmskrshn — Wed, 22 Feb 2023 07:53:11 GMT

Is there a way i can not have the wrapper around the at commands?

I disabled at_shell but i cannot still use plain AT+CFUN=4

RE: nrf9160 says AT commands are not found

Torje — Wed, 22 Feb 2023 07:41:46 GMT

Hey,

This is with the modem shell sample, right? Then you have to write it as such:

"at at+cfun4". It need the at keyword first to know it should be handled as a at command.