<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>PPK2 accuracy</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/97004/ppk2-accuracy</link><description>I want to be 100% sure of my understanding about PPK2 accuracy. 
 https://infocenter.nordicsemi.com/topic/ug_ppk2/UG/ppk/ppk_measure_accuracy.html 
 For lowest range (100nA-50&amp;#181;A), what is accuracy ? Do I understand correctly it is “10% of reading + 2</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2023 09:23:49 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/97004/ppk2-accuracy" /><item><title>RE: PPK2 accuracy</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/412436?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2023 09:23:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:478cd473-c4b9-40c2-ab2d-056c02c2e57f</guid><dc:creator>haakonsh</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;You should not need to add 2% of 200nA, but by all means add +/- 4nA.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: PPK2 accuracy</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/412419?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2023 08:30:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:c7806bd2-02ed-40ef-9231-82a74a71c951</guid><dc:creator>Julien S</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you,&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;What are the test conditions ? i.e. how large is the set of measurement to&amp;nbsp;achieve the 10% accuracy (simply your internal oversampling or 1s or 60s mean value) ?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Can you please confirm the reading is :&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;100nA +/-10nA&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1&amp;micro;A +/-0.1&amp;micro;A&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;10&amp;micro;A +/- 1&amp;micro;A&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Or do I need to add 2% of&amp;nbsp;something ?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: PPK2 accuracy</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/412355?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2023 19:49:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:0410c32a-3a8d-47ee-b2fb-b005f1af7817</guid><dc:creator>haakonsh</dc:creator><description>[quote user=""]For lowest range (100nA-50µA), what is accuracy ? Do I understand correctly it is “10% of reading + 2% of 50µA” ?[/quote]
&lt;p&gt;No, the R1_Offset is&amp;nbsp;the accuracy of&amp;nbsp;R1_Resol, ie. +/- 2% of 200nA. R1_Resol is one ADC lsb.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;R1_Accuracy is the total measurement accuracy&amp;nbsp;of the&amp;nbsp;average of a large set of measurements.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: PPK2 accuracy</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/412038?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2023 15:35:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:3022aa4e-6f54-433f-ab35-0dfe9d939d06</guid><dc:creator>Julien S</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;When you have 200nA resolution you can&amp;#39;t have 10nA accuracy&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="https://infocenter.nordicsemi.com/index.jsp?topic=%2Fug_ppk2%2FUG%2Fppk%2Fppk_measure_accuracy.html"&gt;https://infocenter.nordicsemi.com/index.jsp?topic=%2Fug_ppk2%2FUG%2Fppk%2Fppk_measure_accuracy.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Most meter will announce %of reading + %of range or %or reading + N x lastReadingDigit&lt;br /&gt;But normally range is&amp;nbsp;presented as a single number meaning 50&amp;micro;A not like a real range 100nA-50&amp;micro;A&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The information is misleading, that&amp;#39;s why I want an official confirmation&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: PPK2 accuracy</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/412025?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2023 15:01:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:fce5626a-4fad-4914-8d46-68c5bcd871e9</guid><dc:creator>droidecahedron</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I recently used the PPK2, and my interpretation of that sheet was the following:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the range of 100 nA to 50 uA, expect a +- 10% accuracy with a +-2% offset&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So 100 nA +/- 10nA for accuracy&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;and it could be offset by +/- 2nA&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;for 1uA following same logic,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1 uA +/- 0.1uA, with up to 0.02 uA of offset.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I would also like this confirmed.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>