<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>running nrf 52832 with external 16 MHz crystal</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/9876/running-nrf-52832-with-external-16-mhz-crystal</link><description>Hi 
 nrf 52832 is able to run in 64 MHz using external 32 MHz crystal.
I wondered if I can use an external 16 MHz crystal, and get the CPU to run in 32 Mhz. 
 Thanks
Yaron</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2015 12:30:27 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/9876/running-nrf-52832-with-external-16-mhz-crystal" /><item><title>RE: running nrf 52832 with external 16 MHz crystal</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/36629?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2015 12:30:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:27632a49-13ff-4826-8aad-7b971a3ba3a8</guid><dc:creator>yaron</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Martin. Thanks for your answer.
You are basicly correct, my porpuse is to save current. But since in my code I have some built-in delays (in which lower clock would consume less current), I wanted to test running in lower clock.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: running nrf 52832 with external 16 MHz crystal</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/36628?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2015 10:00:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:16781689-992b-41f3-8c80-2ee1be00e059</guid><dc:creator>MartinBL</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Sorry for the late response. We chose not to implement a clock divider because we found 64MHz to be most effective in terms of current consumption and hence we didn&amp;#39;t see the need for a clock divider. Using a 64MHz clock will of course execute your tasks faster and overall you want save power reducing the clock speed. Out of curiosity, do your a different reason to reduce the clock speed?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: running nrf 52832 with external 16 MHz crystal</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/36627?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2015 14:27:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:9d022852-a63c-43c5-9c43-5bc82416b2c5</guid><dc:creator>yaron</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Martin&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I just wonder, why can&amp;#39;t the CPU run at 32 MHz?
Thanks again&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: running nrf 52832 with external 16 MHz crystal</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/36626?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2015 13:46:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:20508f84-91dd-40b8-8e32-366cbe28efd3</guid><dc:creator>MartinBL</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Simple answers:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You &lt;em&gt;have&lt;/em&gt; to use a 32MHz crystal
(16MHz crystals are no longer an
option as it used to be on the
nRF51).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You can &lt;em&gt;only&lt;/em&gt; run the CPU at
64MHz.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>