<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Reception of CTE with the Nordic Softdevice Controller for AoA</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/99108/reception-of-cte-with-the-nordic-softdevice-controller-for-aoa</link><description>Hi all, 
 
 I am trying to implement a piece of firmware that uses the Distance Measurement Toolbox, on top of that I want to make AoA measurements. 
 Since I am using the distance measurement toolbox, it means that I have to use the Softdevice from Nordic</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2023 22:49:16 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/99108/reception-of-cte-with-the-nordic-softdevice-controller-for-aoa" /><item><title>RE: Reception of CTE with the Nordic Softdevice Controller for AoA</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/431126?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2023 22:49:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:ee349747-c28c-4885-981a-b45bab90c8a1</guid><dc:creator>loquat</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/100669/direction-finding-connectless-cte-rx-is-supported-on-ncs-v2-4-0-with-softdevice-controller"&gt;this ticket&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class="HwtZe" lang="en"&gt;&lt;span class="jCAhz ChMk0b"&gt;&lt;span class="ryNqvb"&gt;Unfortunately, Nordic SEMI doesn&amp;#39;t seem to want to implement AoA reception functionality in SoftDeviceController.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Reception of CTE with the Nordic Softdevice Controller for AoA</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/422878?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2023 06:42:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:4f2a2308-dd5f-4984-b521-2fb8d94005fb</guid><dc:creator>Edvin</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I believe the bug was introduced in v2.2.0, so I would try v2.1.0. Personally, I have never tried AoA or AoD, but if you have a setup, it would be fairly quick to check whether it works or not in that version.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;BR,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Edvin&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Reception of CTE with the Nordic Softdevice Controller for AoA</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/422798?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2023 14:42:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:8963d5a3-f527-44c5-a32d-06c7ded7ad96</guid><dc:creator>ColinC</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Edvin, &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am indeed using V2.3.0 (my bad, wrong number in the initial post). &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What version of the SDK do you suggest I should rollback to?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Many Thanks&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Colin&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Reception of CTE with the Nordic Softdevice Controller for AoA</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/422779?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2023 13:57:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:4bc8b527-db8f-4630-9898-e2f11a100cb4</guid><dc:creator>Edvin</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sorry for the late reply.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am sorry, but I don&amp;#39;t have an answer to your questions at this point in time. I want to ask a specific colleague of mine, but he is out of office this week. I can check with him later.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am not convinced that changing all instances of&amp;nbsp;&lt;span&gt;!BT_CTLR to BT_CTLR gives you &amp;quot;the opposite behavior&amp;quot;.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;For example if it says:&amp;nbsp;if (A || B)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;and you change &amp;quot;B&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;!B&amp;quot;, it doesn&amp;#39;t change the outcome if A is true, so you need to look into every single one, and be careful what you change.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;I am tempted to say that until we are able to provide a fix in the post that you linked to (this bug is still present in v2.3.0, which I assume you are using. Not v2.3.3), I would say that rolling back to before this was broken is easier than trying to patch this up by changing the dependencies. Is that an option?&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Best regards,&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Edvin&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>