<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>nRF5 Series - a popular platform for open source RTOS</title><link>/nordic/nordic-blog/b/blog/posts/nrf5-series-a-popular-platform-for-open-source-rto</link><description>Note: Many things have changed since I wrote this article, in particular for Zephyr and Arm Mbed. The information is outdated and the article is mainly of historical interest.
Regarding the choice Nordic Semiconductor has made one as you might know: </description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><item><title>RE: nRF5 Series - a popular platform for open source RTOS</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/nordic/nordic-blog/b/blog/posts/nrf5-series-a-popular-platform-for-open-source-rto</link><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2020 08:39:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:0d95419d-2be0-49b4-8153-0bef69d7fe7f</guid><dc:creator>MarcelR</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;Please update this post and keep it current:&lt;br /&gt;ARM mbed now uses CORDIO as BLE implementation, and CORDIO is not activeley maintained and broken.&lt;br /&gt;It would also be nice if the other statements are updated with newer findings ...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/aggbug?PostID=962&amp;AppID=4&amp;AppType=Weblog&amp;ContentType=0" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: nRF5 Series - a popular platform for open source RTOS</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/nordic/nordic-blog/b/blog/posts/nrf5-series-a-popular-platform-for-open-source-rto</link><pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2017 14:10:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:0d95419d-2be0-49b4-8153-0bef69d7fe7f</guid><dc:creator>johnny</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi guys! I am working on a project using nrf 51 and want to use Contiki OS on it. Is it sufficient to make some changes on  nrf52 port to be supported by Contiki. If yes what are these changes ? Thanks !&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/aggbug?PostID=962&amp;AppID=4&amp;AppType=Weblog&amp;ContentType=0" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: nRF5 Series - a popular platform for open source RTOS</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/nordic/nordic-blog/b/blog/posts/nrf5-series-a-popular-platform-for-open-source-rto</link><pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2016 13:39:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:0d95419d-2be0-49b4-8153-0bef69d7fe7f</guid><dc:creator>Marcio Montenegro</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Eirik, Please update zephyr in  your post:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Zephyr now supports nrf52 dk,nrf51dk,nrf51 ble nano and bbc microbit.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/aggbug?PostID=962&amp;AppID=4&amp;AppType=Weblog&amp;ContentType=0" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: nRF5 Series - a popular platform for open source RTOS</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/nordic/nordic-blog/b/blog/posts/nrf5-series-a-popular-platform-for-open-source-rto</link><pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2016 13:46:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:0d95419d-2be0-49b4-8153-0bef69d7fe7f</guid><dc:creator>Eirik Midttun</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;It is very interesting indeed, especially the RTOSes that have appeared recently. I cannot comment on plans we have at Nordic, but obviously we would be fools to ignore what is happening in the RTOS space. And if there is interest in the market it is even harder to ignore ;)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/aggbug?PostID=962&amp;AppID=4&amp;AppType=Weblog&amp;ContentType=0" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: nRF5 Series - a popular platform for open source RTOS</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/nordic/nordic-blog/b/blog/posts/nrf5-series-a-popular-platform-for-open-source-rto</link><pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2016 12:17:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:0d95419d-2be0-49b4-8153-0bef69d7fe7f</guid><dc:creator>Christopher</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for your answer. The nRF52 has a lot of flash/ram, so in my case the size of the SoftDevice is not really an issue - lower power consumption is more important.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You post is interesting because they are quite a lot of (RT)OSes and IoT OSes out there. I would be interesting in reading a detailed comparison with for instance power consumption measurement for real applications.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You (Nordic) have you planned to officially support these OS in a near future ? Are you evaluating some of them ?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/aggbug?PostID=962&amp;AppID=4&amp;AppType=Weblog&amp;ContentType=0" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: nRF5 Series - a popular platform for open source RTOS</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/nordic/nordic-blog/b/blog/posts/nrf5-series-a-popular-platform-for-open-source-rto</link><pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2016 12:02:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:0d95419d-2be0-49b4-8153-0bef69d7fe7f</guid><dc:creator>Eirik Midttun</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, they both have open source BLE stacks. I don&amp;#39;t have a full overview of the feature set, but the implementation seems quite feature rich.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you care about power consumption and throughput I think the SoftDevice is the better solution at the moment, since it is heavily power optimized and the throughput is measured. I haven&amp;#39;t seen numbers for the open source stacks. The main advantage with the open source stack is flexibility to add features, or remove features that are not needed in the product.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/aggbug?PostID=962&amp;AppID=4&amp;AppType=Weblog&amp;ContentType=0" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: nRF5 Series - a popular platform for open source RTOS</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/nordic/nordic-blog/b/blog/posts/nrf5-series-a-popular-platform-for-open-source-rto</link><pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2016 11:43:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:0d95419d-2be0-49b4-8153-0bef69d7fe7f</guid><dc:creator>Christopher</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>&lt;p&gt;Zephyr and mynewt they both use Bluetooth from source, this means they use an open-source implementation of the BLE stack and a custom driver to use the nRF radio ?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What are the available BLE features for theses OSes ? What about the consumption and the BLE throughout ?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/aggbug?PostID=962&amp;AppID=4&amp;AppType=Weblog&amp;ContentType=0" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>