This post is older than 2 years and might not be relevant anymore
More Info: Consider searching for newer posts

IC Antenna Matching Circuit

I was wondering would it be possible to use a 50 ohm IC Antenna (like this one) for the nRF51822 with the matching circuit given for the nRF24 (link here)?

It seems like it should work but i am not an RF expert so wanted to throw it out there.

  • If you follow the guideline, then the impedance on end of the matching circuit will be close to 50 Ohm. This is for nRF24 and nRF51822 the same process. It is the same for nearly all RF ICs on the market. Most time a balanced feeding point will be converted to an unbalanced feeding point. The mentioned antenna is a 50 monopole with resonance in the 2400 MHz band. Be aware that components close to the antenna, the plastic enclosure, the type of the plastic, the thickness of the plastic and the distance to the plastic will interfere with the antenna. BTW, the size of the PCB and the thickness of your PCB will interfere the antenna as well. You or a RF consulter can tune the impedance and centre frequency by a matching between the 50 Ohm on end of the balun and the embedded antenna.

    Nothing will interfere your embedded antenna?

    Do you plan an M2M device with embedded antennas? You plan your own people, asset or pet tracker? You are aware that metal will short-cut the radio wave and will use a plastic enclosure? Plastic will not interfere? Sorry, but you are wrong. Everything in the near of your antennas will interfere.

    http://www.gsm-modem.de/M2M/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Theremin.jpg

    Theremin with its two antennas

    The best example is the musical instrument called Theremin. The Theremin has two antennas. One is for controlling the loudness and the other is for the pitch. The body of the artist is already a part of the electromagnetic field. The artist has to stand still and only the fingers close to the antennas will be used to change the tone and loudness. Exactly the same will happen with the antennas of your M2M device. The plastic enclosure close to the antennas will interfere, the thickness of the plastic will interfere and even the thickness of the PCB will interfere. The resonate frequency of an antenna tested and tuned in free field will jump slightly higher as soon the same antenna will be assembled in a plastic box. Your GPS or 2400 MHz antennas (Bluetooth, WIFI/WLAN, ZigBee, ANT+) will be detuned. Their resonate frequency in free space is less than the resonate frequency you would like to receive inside the box. The GPS or 2400 MHz antennas often can be ordered in several steps of 2 MHz for away from center frequency 0f the band. With GSM or other cellular chip antenna this is not possible. This type of antenna will often tuned by components in the matching circuit. You can shift the frequency by selecting and changing the components on the PCB. The exceptions are PCB tracks inside your PCB. Such antennas you can tune by changing the length of the radiator. There are further options for optimisation, but this short article cannot describe all.

    Take care on the thickness of the PCB. 0.8 mm or 1.6 mm are the standard values. If the antenna is tested on 0,8 mm then the effect on 1,6 mm will be the same than plastic enclosure close to the antenna. The resonate frequency will jump. The Epsilon R of air is 1. The Epsilon R of plastic is in the near or 3 and the Epsilon R of FR4 is nominal 4.2. If the radio wave will move from air in another material, the wavelength will change. The enclosure and the material of the PCB will interfere with the antenna. All other parts close by will interfere as well. Metal in the near will decrease the radio wave and will deform the antenna pattern tested in free field as well. The battery and the display are often big metal parts in a M2M device. We hope that this few lines will assist you and help you to design a proper working M2M device. If you are still not sure what to do or if you already run in trouble, then it is highly recommended to ask for advice by a third party with skills in radio technology.

    The whole story with answers on all questions here: www.gsm-modem.de/.../

    Nothing will interfere your embedded antenna?
    Why the embedded chip or patch antennas are resonant on the wrong – to high – frequency?
    How will the ground plane effect your embedded antenna?
    Which radio approvals has your M2M device to pass?
    How to connect your embedded antenna with your wireless module?
    How to design an antenna matching circuit?
    How to switch between an internal and external cellular or GNSS antenna cheap?
    Which GPS antenna shall be used for a tracking device?
    Which embedded antenna to select for a Bluetooth / GNSS application?
    Dos and don’ts during embedded antenna design in
    Examples for good and bad M2M designs with embedded antennas
    Q&A: Design in of embedded antennas
    
  • That article cleared up a few of my questions. Just a few clarifications to get my bearings. I am less worried about fine tuning right now and more about getting the initial design done.

    1. You mentioned the impedance at the end of the matching circuit will be close to 50 Ohm for both nRF24 and nRF51822 reference designs. From a functional standpoint the two matching circuits are then interchangeable.

    2. A PCB antenna designed according to the nordic whitesheets will be 50 ohm if trace length is tuned correctly (via the procedure given).

    3. Even though performance will vary with antenna size/position/type etc, different 50 ohm antennas are interchangeable under optimal zero interference situations with the same matching circuit.

    Thanks again!

  • That article cleared up a few of my questions. Just a few clarifications to get my bearings. I am less worried about fine tuning right now and more about getting the initial design done.

    1. You mentioned the impedance at the end of the matching circuit will be close to 50 Ohm for both nRF24 and nRF51822 reference designs. From a functional standpoint the two matching circuits are then interchangeable.

    2. A PCB antenna designed according to the nordic whitesheets will be 50 ohm if trace length is tuned correctly (via the procedure given).

    3. Even though performance will vary with antenna size/position/type etc, different 50 ohm antennas are interchangeable under optimal zero interference situations with the same matching circuit.

    Thanks again!

    1. You mentioned the impedance at the end of the matching circuit will be close to 50 Ohm for both nRF24 and nRF51822 reference designs. From a functional standpoint the two matching circuits are then interchangeable. HN: They are not. The impendance of the nRF24 and the nRF51822 could be different. The balun made for nRF24 is operating with nRF51822 only, if there is an aditional capacitor on the end of the balun. The matching circuit will transform the impedance of the IC and will filter some harmonic wavs as well.

    2. A PCB antenna designed according to the nordic whitesheets will be 50 ohm if trace length is tuned correctly (via the procedure given). HN: It will be or it will maybe not. You get something with close to 50 Ohm and resonance in 2400 MHz band. Why you will not get what you want you will learn by reading here: www.gsm-modem.de/.../

    3. Even though performance will vary with antenna size/position/type etc, different 50 ohm antennas are interchangeable under optimal zero interference situations with the same matching circuit. HN: There is no zero interference condition in real life. The parameters of the antennas are validated on reference PCB without enclosure only. By reading here: www.gsm-modem.de/.../ you wil learn which parameters will change and why. To learn further, you have to read a lot of book, to stay a longer time at university or to ask your local Field Application Engiineer Wireless or to hire a consulter with RF skills.

    You device will radiate if you follow to guidelines of the manual. It will maybe not radiate perfect and offer less range. It will worst case radiate on other frequencies, because you try to copy a matching circuit from design A to design B.

  • Herald- Just to verify, the two-port output impedance of the nRF51 is different from the 24. The ST balun was designed for the 24, thus the 50 ohm output of the balun may not be achieved on the 51 without the additional 0.8pF shunt capacitor shown in the reference designs?

    Is this the only reason for the additional 0.8pF capacitor on the nRF51 reference design compared to the 24 which does not have that?

    Thanks for the response. -Zach

Related